I have not seen a solid SSO standard specification. I like your idea of the properties file. We were just thinking of the properties file idea too, since we may have to support another SSO vendor for the deployment I am working with. However, we probably will not start this work until summer. I hope you can achieve a flexible Login portlet to handle the SSO interfaces.
Sorry to have missed your earlier emails. I have not looked to see how Jetspeed2 was addressing SSO, maybe some SSO interfaces are established in J2.
Good luck,
Glen


Jignesh Badani wrote:

Glen, when I meant an easier way, I meant an actual Login or SSO Portlet which would be available to Admins to customize and achieve SSO in a much simpler fashion . It could be even a properties file.

Choices available in the customizer could be: SSO Enable = yes/no
Name of HTTP Header/Cookie to trust = "http_some_header_variable"
Shared Secret (added security) = "secret"
Automatically Register user = yes/no
Default Role(s) = "user"
Default Group(s) = "HR"


Many portal solutions like Tibco. Plumtree provide this feature and makes sense too as Portal administrator need not go and hack into the code and change it in multiple places. And if more custom security is desired like secondary validation (if trusting HTTP header is not suffice), then the Portlet can be simply be extended.

Sounds like a good project for me. In the mean time, I have gone ahead and changed JLoginUser to read and trust the the HTTP header. I will now work on the Auto registration piece next.

Thanks for you help.
-Jignesh





Glen Carl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
03/17/2004 04:51 PM
Please respond to "Jetspeed Users List"

To: Jetspeed Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: Subject: Re: Is there a Login Portlet in Jetspeed 1.4?



The "Login portlet", is a portlet, but is a portlet for the operation of Jetspeed. The source code I mentioned is a component of this portlet. The "vm" login template is just the front end that will be replaced by your SSO tool. Just modifying the template probably will not work, and is not a wise design choice.
Glen


Jignesh Badani wrote:


Thanks Glen for your prompt response.

If you please read my earlier post : http://www.mail-archive.com/jetspeed-user%40jakarta.apache.org/msg11720.html

In there, I have mentioned that I tried going through the code you mentioned in your email. I was just hoping there was a better way. The text "Login portlet" in Resources.properties is misleading.

-Jignesh

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to