OJB is what I had experience with at the time when I was working with Jetspeed 1 at my previous company. AFAIK, we can't use Hibernate in any Apache projects because of Hibernate's LGPL license. So that is why OJB was also chosen for Jetspeed 2. However, the entire O/R api in J2 is abstracted by our PersistenceStore API layer, so if you wanted to use Hibernate in J2, it would be very easy to implement.

I did look at some of the JDO implementations out there at the time and they either had incompatible licenses or were to immature.

Bob Fleischman wrote:

Why OJB? There are quite a few Object Relational solutions, is there any one
preferred by the Jetspeed group.


-----Original Message-----
From: Scott T. Weaver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 12, 2004 12:11 PM
To: Jetspeed Users List
Subject: Re: Has anyone used Hibernate


In a past life I converted all of the the Torque api pieces to OJB, which proved to be much easier than I had expected.

Bob Fleischman wrote:



with Jetspeed and are there any 'gotchas' to look out for??

Thanks

Bob


--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]












--
******************************************
*           Scott T. Weaver              *
*         <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>            *
*     <http://www.einnovation.com>       *
* -------------------------------------- *
*   Apache Jetspeed Enterprise Portal    *
*     Apache Pluto Portlet Container     *
*                                        *
* OpenEditPro, Website Content Mangement *
*     <http://www.openeditpro.com>       *
******************************************


--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to