Hi Michael,

Thanks for your quick reply. I have also switched to
MyFacesGenericPortlet. However, it also gives unpredictable weired
results.

I had a look on code CVS repository of and certainly would like to use
your work. There are no build instructions for the code. Can you help
me to find what I would need to build this code? Is this code
independent of MyFaces and Jetspeed Portal bridges?

It would also be nice if I can get a jar file of you patched code for
quick testing.

Looking forward to your kind help.

Regards,

Raj

On 3/7/06, Dr. Michael Lipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Raj Saini wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am developing portlets based on jsf bridge. I have a form with input
> > text  field and it's required attirbute set to true.  When I submit
> > this form with empty input value, validation error message should be
> > printed at <h:messge> tag location. This seems to be not working in
> > jsf bridge based portlets.
> >
> > It looks to me that fields are being validated as I don't see the
> > action handler's process action method called however,  validation
> > messages is not printed.
> >
> > Have someone experienced similar problem or I am missing something?
>
> It is a known issue, see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PB-7.
>
> When I evaluated the JSF bridge from the bridges project and the
> MyFacesGenericPortlet from MyFaces last year, I found that
> MyFacesGenericPortlet caused less problems. I'm now using a heaviliy
> fixed MyFacesGenericPortlet; you can find the sources in
> http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/wfmopen/wfmopen/src/de/danet/an/util/jsf/.
>
> Using JSF based Portlets seems to put you some no man's land. The error
> reported to portals bridges is unassigned since Sep 2005 and my patches
> for MyFacesGenericPortlet didn't receive much interest. My conclusion
> is: JSF based portlets are great to work with, but currently you have to
> maintain your own bridge code. This isn't too hard, and you gain good
> understanding of the JSF lifecycle. Of course, it is not as it should be...
>
>
>     Michael
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to