Mansour and Woosan both thank you both for you responses.

Woosan, this was exactly the answer I was hoping for, thanks!

Kind regards,
Ruben

On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 1:53 AM, Woonsan Ko <woon_...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>
> Hi Ruben,
>
> I don't know why exactly.
> My guess is that we can use spring configuration to invoke initialize() and
> destroy() of the valve bean for the purpose, so it hasn't be regarded as
> necessary.
> Currently a valve's life cycle is managed by spring bean factory, not by
> pipeline.
> If we add destroy() method in Valve interface, then we need to make
> Pipeline invoke the lifecycle methods of Valve. It is meaningful in a sense,
> but I cannot find any pragmatic benefit now.
>
> Regards.
>
> Woonsan
>
> --- On Tue, 5/5/09, Ruben de Gooijer <r.degooi...@onehippo.com> wrote:
>
> > From: Ruben de Gooijer <r.degooi...@onehippo.com>
> > Subject: Valve
> > To: jetspeed-user@portals.apache.org
> > Date: Tuesday, May 5, 2009, 11:18 PM
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Can someone explain to me why the Valve interface has an
> > initialize method
> > but no destroy method?
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Kind regards,
> > Ruben
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: jetspeed-user-unsubscr...@portals.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: jetspeed-user-h...@portals.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to