The error I see when trying to stop or undeploy from Portal Application
Manager:

I see this in the jetspeed-deployment.log
2012-03-26 09:14:23,530 [http-8510-1] ERROR deployment - IOException:
java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused: connect

and I see this in the portlet UI:
Failed to stop application: /<my-portal-application>. Connection to
Application Server is not available.


I've noticed that after I cleaned up the tables manually as I described in
my post, if I subsequently try to deploy that portal application something
doesn't work quite right.
The PA doesn't show up in Portal Application Manager, and I get this in the
jetspeed-deployment.log

2012-03-26 09:04:18,278 [Timer-3] ERROR deployment - Unable to start
portlet application after 10 retries:
org.apache.jetspeed.components.portletregistry.RegistryException: Error
starting portlet application <my-portal-application>
org.apache.jetspeed.components.portletregistry.RegistryException: Error
starting portlet application <my-portal-application>
 at
org.apache.jetspeed.tools.pamanager.PortletApplicationManager.attemptStartPA(PortletApplicationManager.java:677)
at
org.apache.jetspeed.tools.pamanager.PortletApplicationManager.tryStartPortletApplication(PortletApplicationManager.java:244)


This probably answers my question if there are side effects from manually
editing those tables.

On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 8:05 PM, robotdan <djdm...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I have tried that, it hasn't worked for me.
> I am unable to stop or undeploy there, I don't have the exact error
> message off hand, I can post it here when I get in front of it again.
>
> Something like 'can't connect' or something to that effect when I try to
> stop the portal application.
> Are there any special requirements to be able to stop and undeploy a
> portal application through the Portlet Application Manager?
>
> Is it correct to say that the only way for the portal application to
> removed from the Lucene index is to undeploy using the Portlet Application
> Manager?
>
> Would it be possible to piece together an API call with tomcat stopped to
> perform a similar function that the Portlet Application Manager is doing
> for an undeploy?
> I've hunted through the Jetspeed source but haven't anything obvious yet.
>
>
> Thanks.
>
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 7:53 PM, David Sean Taylor <
> davidseantay...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Assume you've tried deleting the application from the Portlet Application
>> Manager. If the application does not show up in the list of applications
>> deployed to your server, then something is out of sync. If it does show up
>> there, simply delete the application. Otherwise, probably the easiest way
>> to resolve is to simply redeploy the app, and then undeploy it. It seems
>> like the application is still indexed in the Lucene index. Deleting or
>> Undeploying an app from the Portlet Application Manager will delete the
>> index
>>
>> On Mar 23, 2012, at 1:19 PM, robotdan wrote:
>>
>> > I'm using Jetspeed 2.2.0 running on Tomcat 6.0.18.
>> >
>> > Is there is a way in which to undeploy a portal application that causes
>> > Jetspeed to perform database cleanup.
>> >
>> > I found a thread back from 2005 that seems to be asking the same
>> question.
>> >
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/portals-jetspeed-user/200507.mbox/%3c42cfefc8....@digizenstudio.com%3E
>> >
>> > To remove our portal application, we just remove the war file, and
>> cleanup
>> > any other jars we've laid down in support of our portal application
>> during
>> > our removal process as was suggested in the above thread.
>> > We do this with Tomcat stopped, but I've also tested removing the jar at
>> > runtime which causes the exploded war directory to also be removed
>> > automatically.  Both of these yield the same results.
>> >
>> > The result being that the Jetspeed database still keeps a record of our
>> > portal application in the PORTLET_APPLICATION table.
>> > The portlets shipped w/ our portal application still have records in the
>> > PORTLET_DEFINITION table - as well as portlet preferences still being
>> > stored.
>> >
>> > The visible problem I have is that these portlets still show up in the
>> > Custom Portlet Selector even after we've removed our portal application.
>> > We don't want users trying to select portlets that do not exist.
>> >
>> > I have tested removing records manually from the Jetspeed database,
>> which
>> > does seem to work, although I don't know if there may be other side
>> effects
>> > of doing so.
>> > After doing this manual cleanup, when I use the Custom Portlet Selector,
>> > the portlets from my removed portal application are gone, and if I go
>> into
>> > the Jetspeed Portlet Application Manager, it is also removed there.
>> >
>> > Here is an example of the SQL I used to do the cleanup: (where the
>> > APPLICATION_ID of 4 corresponds to the portal application that I
>> undeployed)
>> >
>> > DELETE FROM PORTLET_APPLICATION WHERE  APPLICATION_ID = 4
>> > DELETE FROM PORTLET_DEFINITION WHERE APPLICATION_ID = 4
>> >
>> > Is this up to us to clean up, is there a Jetspeed API, or a better way
>> to
>> > undeploy - is it even safe safe to directly modify this table w/out
>> > Jetspeed knowing?
>> > The same probably goes for old records in the PORTLET_PREFERENCE table,
>> > those don't really cause us any problems, but it would be nice to clean
>> up
>> > preferences for users that have been since deleted.
>> >
>> > I have not had any luck with using the Jetspeed portlets for undeploy of
>> > our portal application - and I think even if that worked - that doesn't
>> fit
>> > our needs because we don't expose that function to our end users.
>> > We have command line scripts that add and remove our portal
>> applications.
>> >
>> > Thanks.
>> > Daniel
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: jetspeed-user-unsubscr...@portals.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: jetspeed-user-h...@portals.apache.org
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to