Rapha�l Luta wrote:
<snip>
> > This should be saved in a private directory (ie, the webserver has read/write
> > permissions but it is not accessible via HTTP URL).
> >
>
> This part is implemented, I just have to merge my files with the current
> Jetspeed
> tree, clean up the code and commit all my diffs... give me a couple of days :/
I thought you mentioned this :)...
<snip>
> I wonder how this can be achieved globally since we don't know what is a
> "level of detail" for a given portlet. How should the FilePortlet deal with that
> parameter ?
That is why I have put it off. Certainly the JetspeedContentPortlet
would benefit from a "state". But this could just be a "suggestion"
like we have in PSML. The Portlet would be required to implement this
but it would be suggested.
Kevin
--
Kevin A Burton ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://relativity.yi.org
Message to SUN: "Please Open Source Java!"
"For evil to win is for good men to do nothing."
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Please read the FAQ! <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives and Other: <http://java.apache.org/main/mail.html>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
