"Kevin A. Burton" wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> To do it right. I am really thinking that this should just be part of
> the Portlets meta information and then if the user wants to size a
> specific portlet. Maybe if "maximum" was set then Jetspeed wouldn't
> allow the user to configure a Portlet that was smaller than what it
> wanted.
>
Yes, it could be something like a vetoed property in javabeans.
We would need to extend the portlet interface to declare a property
validation method.
But this would allow 2 kinds of bahavior:
- the user sets his desired size and the portlet can modify the amount of
content details produced based on this parameter
- the portlet refuses any modification to its desired size and thus
can secure its desired space of the screen.
I would be +1 on this feature if it's what you have in mind.
>
> It looks like it might. This would be the way it would be for 1.2. But
> I don't want anyone to allow this Portlet to run in a smaller
> configuration than that. It is really meant to be a large set of data
> not some small '<portl>let' application.
>
Currently, the user can't modify the PSML without editing the file on the
server... will you have the GUI property editing done for 1.2 ?
--
Rapha�l Luta - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Please read the FAQ! <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives and Other: <http://java.apache.org/main/mail.html>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
