on 4/15/00 10:37 AM, Neeme Praks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree, from the first looks that I had.
> I think Zope is more comparable to Turbine (and Cocoon/2 ), but Turbine
> is more light-weight. Also Zope has features that are beyond Turbine
> (like OO-DB).
> Correct me if I'm wrong...
Ok, I will correct the fact that you are wrong...
#1. "Turbine is more light-weight". I'm not quite sure what you mean by that
...you really should explain what you mean when you make statements like
that...
#2. Turbine does have an object->relational mapping...in fact, it has TWO
different packages using TWO different methodologies to choose from...On top
of that, you can also choose to use the one built into
Town...<http://www.working-dogs.com/town/>...so, a total of THREE free Java
OS OR/relational mapping systems are available for you to use.
> On the other hand, Java based stuff (Turbine, Cocoon) is
> more flexible in its implementation and use.
I fully agree with that statement.
I really wish people would take the time to just read the website and make
informed assumptions instead of making wrong assumptions about what these
projects are all about.
-jon
--
Scarab -
Java Servlet Based - Open Source
Bug/Issue Tracking System
<http://scarab.tigris.org/>
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Please read the FAQ! <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives and Other: <http://java.apache.org/main/mail.html>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
