> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rapha�l Luta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2000 12:15 PM
>
> Switching is sure drastic, but if our layout need is not
> comfortably fulfilled
> by Turbine capabilities, we may need to implement something else.
>
> Currently my gut feeling is that Cocoon better fit our layout
> needs while
> Turbine addresses quite well our backend requirements.
well, yes... I understood that we'll stick with the current way of
handling this stuff until we can switch over to Cocoon2. Then hopefully
we can use Avalon framework for different backend (Turbine) and frontend
(Cocoon2) services and Jetspeed itself would also become a
block/component in Avalon. However, there are some hurdles on the way:
Turbine services would need to become Avalon aware and Cocoon2 has to be
reality ;-)
Neeme
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Please read the FAQ! <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives and Other: <http://java.apache.org/main/mail.html>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
