Neeme Praks wrote:
>
> > > This is why we need to use named sets (even if we just use numbers).
> > > When the user selects a Portlet I can have it also select a
> > set. This
> > > way when the user selects 'Add Portlet' the Customizer
> > knows correctly
> > > what set he needs to add this to. The problem is that
> > since PSML can
> > > have theoretically nested <portlets> we can't figure this
> > out without a
> > > kludge :(
> > >
> >
> > I'm not sure I understand you, but if we have a Portlet GUID
> > system, since
> > PortletSet are subclasses of Portlet, you can get a direct
> > reference to a PortletSet whatever the nesting level...
>
> can't we use paths to uniquely identify these sets? In a tree like
> structure like PSML, they would be the most natural way of generating
> GUID's... No?
>
Sure, but with some caveats, check the ID "My update status" thread in the
archive.
--
Rapha�l Luta - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Please read the FAQ! <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives and Other: <http://java.apache.org/main/mail.html>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
