more or less +1 on this thread. I'm not particularly happy with the way skins are handled right now, but probably it will stay this way until Jetspeed2. Neeme > -----Original Message----- > From: Rapha�l Luta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2000 10:59 AM > To: JetSpeed > Subject: Re: PROPOSAL: Portlets, PortletControls and > PortletControllers > withinthe Registry. > > > burtonator wrote: > > > > Please consider this separate from my last proposal. > > > > I want to change PortletRegistry to just a Registry. Then > we can have > > Portlets PortletControls and PortletControllers within it. > > > > The following changes to PSML are required. Please vote if > you have any > > issues: > > > > This is the diff of registry.xds and shows how it will change: > > Basically it will become: > > > > <registry> > > > > <portlet> > > ... > > </portlet> > > > > <portlet-control> > > ... > > </portlet-control> > > > > <portlet-controller> > > ... > > </portlet-controller> > > </registry> > > > > +5. I wanted to do this for a long time. > > I also think we should add: > > <profile> > <!-- store a PSML fragment > (used for easy initialization of user contexts --> > </profile> > > <skin> > <!-- > store skin properties in a named skin object > to enable "themes" > --> > </skin> > > What do you think ? > > -- > Rapha�l Luta - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- > -------------------------------------------------------------- > Please read the FAQ! <http://java.apache.org/faq/> > To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Archives and Other: <http://java.apache.org/main/mail.html> > Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- -------------------------------------------------------------- Please read the FAQ! <http://java.apache.org/faq/> To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives and Other: <http://java.apache.org/main/mail.html> Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
