burtonator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Neeme Praks wrote:
> >
> > I would propose to change the markup to something like
> > <security>
> > <allow>
> > <role>administrators</role>
> > <user>neeme</user>
> > </allow>
> > <deny>
> > <group>HRM</group>
> > </deny>
> > </security>
What is the <group> in the above example? Wouldn't we just define roles and
users in the deny portion also. I'm +1 for this, but don't have the xml
knowledge/time to implement right now. So the above example would be:
<security>
<allow>
<role>admin</role>
<user>hdumpty</user>
</allow>
<deny>
<role>user</role>
</deny>
</security>
And the default for not defining an <allow> or <deny> section would be to
allow or deny everyone?
jb
Jeff Brekke
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://sites.netscape.net/ekkerbj
____________________________________________________________________
Get your own FREE, personal Netscape WebMail account today at
http://webmail.netscape.com.
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Please read the FAQ! <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives and Other: <http://java.apache.org/main/mail.html>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
