"Lacerda, Wellington (AFIS)" wrote:
>
> Not to put you down, guys, but I had the chance to read about a new spec for
> WAP being released soon and introducing radical changes to the current spec.
> Since I'm working on Europe it's making big loud noise around here. See more
> on:
>
> http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20000709.html
> <http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20000709.html>
>
> the reader comments are also a must. At least a lot of work to come (maybe).
<snip>
Yes. There has been talk about WAP being a temporary solution. I
agree. But how long is temporary. If this means 2 months then it is
not worth it. But if it means 2 - 5 years then it is totally worth it.
I think that we will have mobile devices with IPV6 and Mozilla within 1
year. At this time WAP might not be necessary but you still need to get
the population to buy and use them. That will be another year. Almost
all cell phones now have WAP.
Kevin
--
Kevin A Burton (e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED], UIN: 73488596, ZKey:
burtonator)
http://relativity.yi.org
Message to SUN: "Please Open Source Java!"
To fight and conquer in all your battles is not supreme excellence;
supreme
excellence consists in breaking the enemy's resistance without fighting.
- Sun Tzu, 300 B.C.
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Please read the FAQ! <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives and Other: <http://java.apache.org/main/mail.html>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
