"Brekke, Jeff" wrote:

> I am offically asking for CVS write.  I plan on helping Raphael with
> conversion to Turbine Services.  I've contributed one portlet and other
> minor patches in the past.  I'll be offline this weekend ( Friday afternoon
> through Monday ) but will post what I get done.
>

+1 (just in case one of the previous +1 got lost. Fault tolerance :-))

>
> [SNIPPED]
> > Which service do you plan to tackle ?
> > I planned to move the RegistryManager and remove the MemoryStore
> dependency.
> [SNIPPED]
>
> I was just going down the things init'd in JetspeedServlet.  Should we keep
> the DaemonFactory and make that the service and leave the daemons the way
> they are, or look at converting each daemon into a turbine service?  My
> first thought is to leave the daemons since they can be stopped/started from
> the jetspeed admin tool and just make a DaemonService.  Thoughts?
>

I don't have it clear. I will look at more depth. I think that the daemons are
tightly coupled with the Cache implementation, so maybe they will use data structures
from these services. Thiey will be handled from th administration tool. Also, notice
that Turbine has already a persistent scheduler (cron-like) service, which we may use
to implement the daemon autostart feature.

>
> jb
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> This message has been scanned for viruses with Trend Micro's Interscan VirusWall.
>
> --
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> Please read the FAQ! <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
> To subscribe:        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe:      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Archives and Other:  <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=jetspeed>
> Problems?:           [EMAIL PROTECTED]



--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Please read the FAQ! <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
To subscribe:        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives and Other:  <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=jetspeed>
Problems?:           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to