Raphael Luta wrote:
> Jon Stevens wrote:
> >
> > on 11/25/2000 6:33 AM, "Raphael Luta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Jon, I agree on the principle but 1.2b1 is already out.
> > > I don't see how we can swith to an "alpha" without jumping to 1.3.
> >
> > Ok. 1.3a1 and simply note on the website that the Jetspeed project is
> > essentially taking a step back to make sure that it is implemented properly
> > before another "real" release.
> >
>
> I'm +0 there. I can't say I really like either alternative...
>
+1. In addition to what Jon says, changing number to 1.3 will stress differences
with other public releases, such as OpenJODA. Their code is based on 1.2b1, and
given the reorganization we are doing, it is better to make clear that source is
diverging.
They are invited to upgrade their release, of course, as soon as 1.3a code
stabilises.
>
> --
> Rapha�l Luta - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> --
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> Please read the FAQ! <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
> To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Archives and Other: <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=jetspeed>
> Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Please read the FAQ! <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives and Other: <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=jetspeed>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
