At 22:31 2000-12-17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I've upgraded 2 portlets:
> NewRSSPortlet
> XSLPortlet
>
>These 2 portlets may now be correctly rendered on boh HTML and WML
>devices.
>I'd appreciate if everybody could test the maxiumum number of the
>portlets defined in:
>
>org.apache.jetspeed.portal.portlets.*
>
>to make sure that they all work correctly.
>I've moved out of the main tree 2 portlets:
> CocoonPortlet
> PollPortlet
>which get their own dedicated module.
>
>I think the only portlets which should stay in the
>main source tree are both that are completely up to date, work correctly
>and are considered necessary for the basic operation of Jetspeed. All the
>other portlets should be moved in /modules which will act as a portlet
>repository.
>
>Questions:
>- What do you think of the status of ApplicationsPortlet. Is it still useful ?
>- Ingo> Do you plan to upgrade the TestWMLPortlet for the release ?
> Currently, it serves no useful purpose since you could just as well define
> 3 portlets in the registry which derived from FileServerPortlet and
> directly
> serve WML files...
No, this is not planed. I only included this test portlet in my WML
check-ins because there was no other local WML portlet that could be used
to test it. We should replace it by a FileServlePortlet serving WML files.
ingo.
>--
>Rapha�l Luta - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Vivendi Universal Networks - Services Manager / Paris
>
>
>--
>--------------------------------------------------------------
>Please read the FAQ! <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
>To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Archives and Other: <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=jetspeed>
>Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Please read the FAQ! <http://java.apache.org/faq/>
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives and Other: <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=jetspeed>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
