> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, December 18, 2000 10:01 AM > To: JetSpeed > Subject: Re: docs > > > David Sean Taylor wrote: > > > > Raphael Luta wrote: > > > > > > > Im concentrating on converting my Developers Guide to 1.3a1. I > > > think I can > > > > finish it tomorrow along with > > > > the top tasks below 'Working documents' > > > > > > > > Also think we should regenerate the javadocs and put them on > > > the website. > > > > > > > > > > I agree. Should we also put them in the webapp ? > > > > > > > Of course the javadocs can always be built with one easy command. > > Its a question of do we want to make the war bigger versus the > trade off of > > having the javadocs immediately available with the war file. I > think that > > the javadocs should go into the webapp, since the webapp is really a > > starting point for people to start using the system and learn about it. > > > > If you looked at the new default.psml, there's a link on the > Jetspeed portlet > that goes straight to the website documentation. Of course we can > also bundle > the docs with the webapp but it is only useful if we distribute a > "binary" > webapp without the source code. Yes Ive seen it. The first link is fine, but the second link goes to a directory on the server which is really just the same as the first link. In my opinion having a link to a directory on the server is confusing. Perhaps we could put a link to the javadocs here. I own a copy of Togethersoft, I just generated a combination of UML and Javadocs. Here is a link to the javadocs generated for the current branch... http://www.bluesunrise.com/jetspeed/javadocs/ > "binary" webapp without the source code. Not a bad idea. Then people can install without the build step. You would think that would *really* cut down on the installation questions..... > > > > > > > We will always need an administration feature even though the > > > administration > > > screen is likely to change soon. For this release, I think we > > > should keep it > > > as is. > > > > > > > Is the administration going to be working in 1.3a1? > > If so, what do you mean by changing and how soon? Is it > changing for 1.3a1? > > > > It will not change before 1.3a1. We'll try to make admin work OK > for this release. If it's not possible, it'll be mentioned in the > release notes. It's not a big issue since there're no links to the > Admin screen right now so people won't test it unless they read the > documentation... > > -- > Rapha�l Luta - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Vivendi Universal Networks - Services Manager / Paris > > > -- > -------------------------------------------------------------- > Please read the FAQ! <http://java.apache.org/faq/> > To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Archives and Other: <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=jetspeed> > Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- -------------------------------------------------------------- Please read the FAQ! <http://java.apache.org/faq/> To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives and Other: <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=jetspeed> Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
