Thomas F. Boehme wrote:
> David,
>
>
>> Implementors who do not use SAX will be required to implement these
>> methods (in a abstract base class that does nothing).
>
>
> It's worse than that. A portlet relying on SAX will not work in that case.
> That means we have to introduce something that says "I require SAX and if
> you don't implement, I am not going to run". Portlet portability adios!
>
This is not true. I will give you a default implementation that streams the
ContentHandler into the ResponseWriter.
It is efficient and very simple to implement. This can be the default for any portal
that does not want to have higher
level processing of SAX events. In fact, javax.xml.transform.stream.StreamResult
already provides such an implementation.
> Cheers,
> Thomas
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Search: <http://www.mail-archive.com/jetspeed@list.working-dogs.com/>
List Help?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
