with a simple handler you don't have any of the weight of the servlet API so your correct it would be lighter weight but it does tie you to jetty. If your willing to give up the whole servlet, filters, etc etc then handlers are a simple way to go
you gain...less code between your request and your response :) jesse -- jesse mcconnell [email protected] On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 13:25, S Ahmed <[email protected]> wrote: > If I have a simple endpoint that captures data from a http post, I'm > thinking a jetty handler might be lighter than using servlets. > > But it does tie my implementation into jetty. > > Other than that, is there any performance gains with going with a native > jetty handler over a servlet implementation? > > i.e. what do I gain? > > _______________________________________________ > jetty-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users > _______________________________________________ jetty-users mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users
