On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Joakim Erdfelt <[email protected]> wrote: > Good feedback. > > Curious, where did you see this isClean style of close behavior?
It matches the Javascript WebSocket client side, where the CloseEvent passed to the onclose handler has "wasClean", "reason", and "code" properties (see https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/WebSockets/WebSockets_reference/CloseEvent). A frontend developer who doesn't care about specific close codes would probably write their code such that the WebSocket's onclose method fires onClose(reason) when wasClean is true and onError(reason) when wasClean is false. > > -- > Joakim Erdfelt <[email protected]> > webtide.com > Developer advice, services and support > from the Jetty & CometD experts > eclipse.org/jetty - cometd.org > > > > On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 3:31 PM, Brandon Mintern <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> Thanks for the explanations, guys. I changed the code to 4000 for >> errors and 1000 for successful exits, and everything is now working as >> I expected. >> >> It looks like jetty-9's WebSocketSession provides the same close() and >> close(code, message) methods? While these work well enough if you're >> familiar with the RFC, I think it would be nice to provide a >> close(boolean isClean, String reason) method. Then, internally, this >> would call either close(1000, reason) or close(UNKNOWN_ERROR, reason), >> where UNKNOWN_ERROR is 4000, 4999, some other 4xxx, or a special >> JETTY_UNKNOWN_ERROR close code registered with IANA in the 3000-3999 >> range. >> >> Optionally, close(reason) could also be implemented as close(false, >> reason). >> >> Thoughts? >> >> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Joakim Erdfelt <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> > Quick answer, if you want a reason message, you have to specify a valid, >> > can be sent over the wire, close status code. >> > >> > Detail answer, >> > The WebSocket spec (RFC 6455, Section 5.5.1. Close) >> > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6455#section-5.5.1 >> > >> > A Close frame MAY contain a body. >> > If there is a body, the first two bytes of the body MUST be a 2-byte >> > unsigned integer representing the status code. >> > Following the 2-byte integer, the body MAY contain UTF-8 encoded data >> > with reason. >> > >> > And the status codes allowed to be sent over the wire are in Section >> > 7.4.1. >> > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6455#section-7.4.1 >> > >> > Some status codes are not allowed to be sent over the network. (They >> > essentially are internal status codes). >> > >> > -- >> > Joakim Erdfelt <[email protected]> >> > webtide.com >> > Developer advice, services and support >> > from the Jetty & CometD experts >> > eclipse.org/jetty - cometd.org >> > >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Brandon Mintern <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> When a connection is closed with a message and closeCode <= 0, the >> >> message is not sent at all. This is because of the test in line 382 of >> >> WebSocketGeneratorRFC6455.java: >> >> >> >> >> >> _outbound.addFrame((byte)FLAG_FIN,WebSocketConnectionRFC6455.OP_CLOSE,bytes,0,code>0?bytes.length:0); >> >> >> >> Is this intended behavior? As a user, I expected that calling >> >> connection.close(-1, "reason for closure") would populate a Javascript >> >> ErrorEvent with: >> >> >> >> wasClean: false >> >> reason: "reason for closure" >> >> >> >> Instead, reason is "". If this is intended behavior, I think the >> >> Javadoc needs some elaboration; it reads: >> >> >> >> >> >> org.eclipse.jetty.websocket.WebSocket.Connection >> >> >> >> public void close(int closeCode, String message) >> >> >> >> Close the connection with specific closeCode and message. >> >> >> >> Parameters: >> >> closeCode - The close code to send, or -1 for no close code >> >> message - The message to send or null for no message >> >> >> >> >> >> As implemented, message is never sent unless closeCode > 0. >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> jetty-users mailing list >> >> [email protected] >> >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users >> >> >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > jetty-users mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> jetty-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > jetty-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users > _______________________________________________ jetty-users mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users
