ok, I quite doubt it can clear IP and all that by the next set of releases but the next ones it should be definitely doable
thanks for the feedback jesse -- jesse mcconnell [email protected] On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Stephane Bailliez <[email protected]>wrote: > Just to confirm, we are all good with 2.2.4. So you can go ahead with the > IP process. > > > On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Stephane Bailliez <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Hi Jan, >> >> Tests so far have been ok on a limited scope, we're putting it through >> its pace in the next couple few minutes and should have a canary in >> production following that. I should have some more concrete news in the >> next few hours and will let you know (and will update jira accordingly) >> >> -- stephane >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 12:55 AM, Jan Bartel <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Stephane, >>> >>> Any luck with testing the newer jars?? We're coming up to a release >>> and I'd like to get this sorted out as soon as possible ... >>> >>> thanks >>> Jan >>> >>> On 28 February 2013 05:46, Stephane Bailliez <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > Hi Jesse, >>> > >>> > Thanks for the reply. >>> > >>> > I went digging a little bit around, found that the javax.el-api 2.2.4 >>> source >>> > code seems to have that particular problem fixed in the sense they >>> don't >>> > cache the classes but rather they just lazily instantiate the factory >>> > statically only once in BeanELResolver. So different fix than the one >>> in >>> > Tomcat land but that should fix our problem. We'll going to test that >>> > version. Will let you know. >>> > >>> > Available at >>> > >>> http://search.maven.org/#artifactdetails%7Cjavax.el%7Cjavax.el-api%7C2.2.4%7Cjar >>> > It's that same version that is shipped with Glassfish 3.1.2.2 as far >>> as I >>> > can see. >>> > >>> > -- stephane >>> > >>> > >>> > On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Jesse McConnell >>> > <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> we take the javax.el stuff from the jasper setup that glassfish uses, >>> >> think there is a jsp project for it at java.net now a days for it >>> (this one >>> >> I think: http://jsp.java.net/) >>> >> >>> >> as for quick fix...we can look at updating the versions but between >>> >> getting it into the CQ process and then orbitifying it is anywhere >>> from a 1 >>> >> week to 4 month process, which is why are are noticeably slow >>> updating that >>> >> :/ >>> >> >>> >> If updating to the tomcat one works for you then that is definitely >>> the >>> >> best short term solution. In the meantime the correct process here >>> it to >>> >> open a bug in bugzilla under RT/Jetty component with details so we >>> can start >>> >> the update process >>> >> >>> >> I'll note that you should be able to test updated jsp artifacts from >>> the >>> >> glassfish jsp setup by replacing them and seeing how they >>> work...giving us >>> >> an idea of what version resolves your problem will help >>> >> >>> >> cheers, >>> >> jesse >>> >> >>> >> -- >>> >> jesse mcconnell >>> >> [email protected] >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Stephane Bailliez < >>> [email protected]> >>> >> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> I opened a few minutes ago: >>> >>> >>> >>> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=401916 >>> >>> >>> >>> This is obviously causing significant performance impact and affect >>> >>> scaling, the only quick alternative I see would be to replace >>> temporarily >>> >>> the orbit javax.el version with the one from tomcat. >>> >>> Short of that working would be to patch the orbit el code. >>> >>> >>> >>> This might seem a bit of a stretch as I'm not sure what is the >>> >>> significant difference without doing a diff between the 2 source >>> codes. I'll >>> >>> have a look at that soonish, in the meantime I was wondering: >>> >>> >>> >>> Is there any significant difference in the codebase that you know of >>> ? >>> >>> From where is coming the repackaged orbit: javax.el >>> 2.2.0.v201108011116 ? >>> >>> >>> >>> Do you see a possible release with updated version of it "soonish" ? >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks ! >>> >>> >>> >>> -- stephane >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> >>> jetty-users mailing list >>> >>> [email protected] >>> >>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >>> >> jetty-users mailing list >>> >> [email protected] >>> >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users >>> >> >>> > >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > jetty-users mailing list >>> > [email protected] >>> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Jan Bartel <[email protected]> >>> www.webtide.com – Developer advice, services and support >>> from the Jetty & CometD experts. >>> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > jetty-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users > >
_______________________________________________ jetty-users mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users
