Matthew, I replied to you on the bug. It would be good if you could attach to the bug an example of a cookie value that you feel is incorrectly encoded in jetty-9.0.4, and even better if you could try jetty-9 HEAD with that cookie value and report the difference (if any).
regards Jan On 13 August 2013 04:16, Giannini, Matthew <[email protected]> wrote: > FYI - spoke with Jesse on IRC about this and filed a bug: > > https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=414898 > > Not sure about the severity, but it seems somewhat significant since it is > an apparent failure to implement the servlet specification. > > Regards, > matthew > > ________________________________ > From: [email protected] [[email protected]] on > behalf of Giannini, Matthew [[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 1:27 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [jetty-users] Jetty 9 does not allow version 0 cookies? > > It appears that even if we explicitly set the version of the Cookie to zero > (0), the cookie’s value is still encoded with version 1 (rfc 2109) > semantics. I do not see any option in the Jetty code that allows for version > 0 support. Has anybody else run into this problem? Could one of the > developers shed some light on this? Is it a bug, or is there some other way > we can enable version 0 cookies? > > > > Thanks and Regards, > > matthew > > > _______________________________________________ > jetty-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users > -- Jan Bartel <[email protected]> www.webtide.com 'Expert Jetty/CometD developer,production,operations advice' _______________________________________________ jetty-users mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users
