Edgar, "baseRequest" and "request" are not necessarily the same - if request wrapping is used, then the "baseRequest" is the unwrapped version, whilst "request" will be the wrapped version.
Jan On 11 December 2014 at 20:15, Edgar Espina <[email protected]> wrote: > thanks. > > today, a jetty handler is highly tied to the Servlet API: > > void handle(String target, Request baseRequest, HttpServletRequest request, > HttpServletResponse response) > > not sure what else depends on Servlet API from jetty-server, but I wonder > how hard should be to change this to: > > void handle(String target, Request baseRequest, Response response) > > I'm probably wrong but, isn't baseRequest and request the exactly same > instance? and why use HttpServletResponse and not jetty version? > > Anyway, isn't a big deal but will be great if the Jetty API can evolve truly > independently of Servlet API. > > > On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Jesse McConnell <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> having said that, the usage of the servlet-api from an implementation >> perspective is largely isolated into the jetty-servlet artifact and >> you can use the native jetty api's within jetty-server as you wish, >> embedded or within the distribution by using the handlers directly or >> whatever abstraction suits you. Just look to the jetty-rewrite module >> for inspiration on what can be done before you ever really enter into >> the servlet implementation. >> >> cheers, >> Jesse >> -- >> jesse mcconnell >> [email protected] >> >> >> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:15 AM, Joakim Erdfelt <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > Not likely to happen for the core server. >> > >> > However, it has happened in other Client side libraries of Jetty. >> > The HTTP Client and WebSocket Client has no requirement on the Servlet >> > API >> > anymore. >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Joakim Erdfelt <[email protected]> >> > webtide.com - intalio.com/jetty >> > Expert advice, services and support from from the Jetty & CometD experts >> > eclipse.org/jetty - cometd.org >> > >> > On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Edgar Espina <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> Just wondering how hard it is to remove the Servlet API from "core >> >> jetty" and provide a Servlet container as a separated jar/module. >> >> >> >> Sometimes I think Servlet API isn't good enough and require a long >> >> time >> >> to update/upgrade and most of the time I found Jetty API more clean and >> >> powerful than Servlet. >> >> >> >> Have you ever think on this? is it even possible? >> >> >> >> Thanks >> >> -- >> >> edgar >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> jetty-users mailing list >> >> [email protected] >> >> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe >> >> from this list, visit >> >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users >> > >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > jetty-users mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe >> > from >> > this list, visit >> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users >> _______________________________________________ >> jetty-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe >> from this list, visit >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users > > > > > -- > edgar > > _______________________________________________ > jetty-users mailing list > [email protected] > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from > this list, visit > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users -- Jan Bartel <[email protected]> www.webtide.com 'Expert Jetty/CometD developer,production,operations advice' _______________________________________________ jetty-users mailing list [email protected] To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users
