Wait, you are managing the setHandler's yourself? You are not using the deploy module in the distribution?
Almost sounds like you are using embedded-jetty techniques. Is this the case? Joakim Erdfelt / [email protected] On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 3:25 AM, John English <[email protected]> wrote: > On 05/08/2015 20:28, Joakim Erdfelt wrote: > >> Dont set virtualHosts at all, no entries. >> Don't use <Set name="virtualHosts"> at all. >> >> That will accept answers from all hosts. >> > > It would appear from my experiments that when there are multiple > "setHandler" blocks defining webapps all mapped to "/", the last one wins > if the virtual host lists are not disjoint. If I have one accepting > 127.0.0.1 (A) and another without a VH list (B), specifying A then B means > that B always responds. If I reverse the order (B then A), A accepts > 127.0.0.1 correctly, but generates a default 404 page for 127.0.0.2 rather > than invoking B. > > > -- > John English > _______________________________________________ > jetty-users mailing list > [email protected] > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe > from this list, visit > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users >
_______________________________________________ jetty-users mailing list [email protected] To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users
