jetty.demo.realm only exists in demo config files - it is not in any java 
files. 

<div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Bill Ross 
<[email protected]> </div><div>Date:10/01/2015  1:06 PM  (GMT-08:00) 
</div><div>To: [email protected] </div><div>Subject: Re: [jetty-users] 
HashLoginService (was JAAS) </div><div>
</div>Jan (or anyone),

> There's also a jetty-specific feature that if the realm-name is omitted from 
> the <login-config> then we'll automatically select the first LoginService 
> that has been defined for a Server instance (eg as an addBean() as has been 
> shown in the doco and in the demo-base/etc/test-realm.xml).

Aha, when I delete the realm-name from the <login-config> in web.xml, I see 
that my HashLoginService evidently didn't get registered even though the 
etc/realm.xml has

<Configure id="Server" class="org.eclipse.jetty.server.Server">
    <Call name="addBean">
      <Arg>
        <New class="org.eclipse.jetty.security.HashLoginService">
          <Set name="name">Test Realm</Set>
          <Set name="config"><Property name="jetty.demo.realm" 
default="etc/realm.properties"/></Set>
          <Set name="refreshInterval">0</Set>
        </New>
      </Arg>
    </Call>

    <Get class="org.eclipse.jetty.util.log.Log" name="rootLogger">
      <Call name="warn"><Arg>demo test-realm is deployed. DO NOT USE IN 
PRODUCTION!</Arg></Call>
    </Get>
</Configure>

And on startup I see:

2015-10-01 12:50:39.793:WARN::main: demo test-realm is deployed. DO NOT USE IN 
PRODUCTION!

2015-10-01 12:50:40.203:WARN:oejw.WebAppContext:main: Failed startup of context 
o.e.j.w.WebAppContext@234bef66{/,file:///Users/priot/pr/jetty-base/webapps/ROOT/,STARTING}{/ROOT}
java.lang.IllegalStateException: No LoginService for 
org.eclipse.jetty.security.authentication.BasicAuthenticator@47db50c5 in 
org.eclipse.jetty.security.ConstraintSecurityHandler@5c072e3f
        at 
org.eclipse.jetty.security.authentication.LoginAuthenticator.setConfiguration(LoginAuthenticator.java:76)
        at 
org.eclipse.jetty.security.SecurityHandler.doStart(SecurityHandler.java:354)
        at 
org.eclipse.jetty.security.ConstraintSecurityHandler.doStart(ConstraintSecurityHandler.java:448)

So there seems to be a bug in docs or code since the HashLoginService setup is 
quietly consumed but seems to have no effect.

And in case anyone is still reading, once again, is the "jetty.demo.realm" 
supposed to mean anything or match anything???

    <Property name="jetty.demo.realm" default="etc/realm.properties"/>

Thanks,
Bill

On 9/30/2015 1:29 AM, Jan Bartel wrote:
Bill,

If you use the same realm-name in the <login-config> element of multiple 
webapps, they'll all share the same LoginService.

There's also a jetty-specific feature that if the realm-name is omitted from 
the <login-config> then we'll automatically select the first LoginService that 
has been defined for a Server instance (eg as an addBean() as has been shown in 
the doco and in the demo-base/etc/test-realm.xml).

Jan

On 30 September 2015 at 18:10, Bill Ross <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Jan, 

So if web.xml only goes in a webapp, how can a realm defined in one cover the 
contents of ROOT?

I will see how you change that text and try the result.

Thanks,
Bill


-------- Original message --------
From: Jan Bartel
Date:09/30/2015 12:46 AM (GMT-08:00)
To: JETTY user mailing list
Subject: Re: [jetty-users] JAAS questions

Hi Bill,

web.xml does not go into the ${jetty.base}                           directory. 
It can only go into a WEB-INF directory of a webapp, such as a webapp inside of 
the ${jetty.base}/webapps directory, which is the default deploy directory.

Also, I will change the text on the Security page which mentions jetty.xml - 
this is no doubt historical from before we had the distinction between 
${jetty.home} and ${jetty.base}.  And no, I do NOT recommend anyone edits 
${jetty.home} - there should be very very very few cases where this is 
necessary (and this isn't one of them :)).

cheers
Jan

On 30 September 2015 at 17:35, Bill Ross <[email protected]>                    
   wrote:
Jan, there was no jetty-base etc dir before I created it to put that file in. I 
thought jetty xmls were additive, but it sounds like the base one tromped the 
home one. I have home set to the distribution of my last build of the current 
tree.

The configuring security link brings me
_______________________________________________
jetty-users mailing list
[email protected]
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from 
this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users

Reply via email to