This is the change from Issue
https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project/issues/9309
With the change from pull-request
https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project/pull/9313

What specific OS are you using? (we tested that change on Linux + Windows
10 + OSX without issue)
And how are you using the --dry-run?

We will likely need to make adjustments to this, but we need more feedback
first.
The new Issue at https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project/issues/9663 could
be a place to coordinate this.

Joakim Erdfelt / joa...@webtide.com


On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 12:36 PM Cantor, Scott <canto...@osu.edu> wrote:

> I think this commit between 10.0.14 and 10.0.15 is breaking my init
> script, which I know is quite non-optimal, but for debugging
> purposes...could I ask what the purpose of [1] is and what its functional
> impact is supposed to be?
>
> What I think is happening is that it's single-quoting all my ini-sourced
> properties. Simple excerpt from --dry-run:
>
> 14:
> jetty.ssl.sniHostCheck=false
>
> 15:
> 'jetty.ssl.sniHostCheck'='false'
>
> It's clear from my results that Jetty does not see the latter at all, it's
> ignoring all my properties and using its defaults, but I don't know if I'm
> overlooking anything. Thought I'd start with "what's the intended change?".
>
> I have historically had to do some sed magic on --dry-run to keep things
> working and I can probably do the same since I don't think my working
> command lines ever had any single quotes, but I'm still poking.
>
> -- Scott
>
> [1]
> https://github.com/eclipse/jetty.project/commit/8c992b9c93dfc505bb619bff1dba662b3d7d7f95
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jetty-users mailing list
> jetty-users@eclipse.org
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users
>
_______________________________________________
jetty-users mailing list
jetty-users@eclipse.org
To unsubscribe from this list, visit 
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jetty-users

Reply via email to