---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: John Ashworth <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 9:50 PM
Subject: [sudan-john-ashworth] Fw: How not to write about Congo
To: Group <[email protected]>


And the same principles could apply to Sudan...

BEGIN

How not to write about Congo

Congo Siasa, Saturday, February 19, 2011
http://congosiasa.blogspot.com/2011/02/how-not-to-write-about-congo.html


Let me take a page from Binyavanga Wainaina's essay and blog my own
two cents, a little bit less tongue-in-cheek, about how not to write
about the Congo.

It's not all about rape and minerals. Yes, things are bad in the
country, and by all means file stories about the conflict and the
suffering. But focusing on the ghastly violence distracts from the
politics that gave rise to the conflict. This comes at a cost: If all
we see is black men raping and killing in the most outlandish ways
imaginable, we might find it hard to believe that there is any logic
to this conflict. We are returned to Joseph Conrad’s notion that the
Congo takes you to the heart of darkness, an inscrutable and
unimprovable mess. If we want to change the political dynamics in the
country, we have above all to understand the conflict on its own
terms. And those terms are not just: Rebels are raping their way
across the country to get their hands on conflict minerals.

Look for agents, not just victims. In print and on radio, the Congo
sometimes descends into a kabuki theater of snot-nosed children/rape
survivors oppressed by savage black soldiers. We need to get away from
this. Some Congolese are unscrupulous and vicious, but they usually
have reasons for what they do. If we can understand why officials rape
- and it's not always just as a 'weapon of war' - and why they steal
money - it's not just because they are greedy - we might get a bit
better at calibrating solutions. Of course, it's much harder to
interview a rapist or a gun-runner than their victims. But don't just
shock us; make us understand. Otherwise we only have ourselves to
blame when we react to a rape epidemic by just building hospitals and
not trying to get at the root causes.

Be careful with ethnic descriptives. For a while, the CNDP was "an
ethnic Tutsi rebellion." While the group was indeed led by Tutsi and
backed by many in the Tutsi community, without further context, that
description makes it seem like the reason for their rebellion was
rooted in their ethnicity. Of course, it was, but it was not because
part of their DNA sequence gave them a predilection for AK-47s, but
because their ethnicity was historically entwined with land conflict
and local power struggles since at least the 1930s.

Which brings me to the FDLR. Yes, they are almost all Hutu. And some
of their leaders were involved in the 1994 genocide. But we really
don't know how many were - a study done for the Rwandan Demobilization
Commission in 2008 only had evidence of a handful of FDLR leaders'
involvement in the genocide. And of the soldiers who return to Rwanda,
very few have been found guilty in gacaca courts for crimes of
genocide. Yes, anti-Tutsi diatribe is still prevalent among the FDLR,
but the group has also included a few Tutsi officers in the past, and
has collaborated with Tutsi groups such as the Banyamulenge in South
Kivu and RPR in North Kivu. So be careful not to conflate them with
genocidaires.

There are few unambiguous heroes and villains. Paul Kagame is not a
saint, not is he Beelzebub. Joseph Kabila is not a Tutsi infiltrator,
a Manchurian candidate, or a selfless patriot. They are both leaders
acting within the constraints of their political systems, driven by a
mix private and public motives. What exactly those constraints are and
that mix is: that, my dear foreign blogger/activist/foreign
correspondent, is the challenge to figure out.

I hate to disappoint you, but many local NGOs have some pretty serious
governance problems; those aid-workers in their air conditioned
vehicles are not always just in it to save the world (and when they
are, it can be all the scarier). But some of these people have
persevered despite all adversity. Figuring out who is who and what
shade of gray their moral universe is colored can take some time. Take
that time.

Challenge yourself. Write different stories. Who are the Chinese
companies working in the Congo and what have their experiences been?
Did you know that Congo was one of the first countries to experiment
with mobile cash-transfers to pay for demobilized soldiers? Have you
checked out the famous artist studios in Kinshasa of Cheri Samba or
Roger Botembe? The country's tax revenues have doubled over the past
several years - how does that square with its corrupt reputation? What
are Dan Gertler's financial relations with the Israeli right-wing? The
Kivus apparently produces 40% of the world supply of quinine - might
be a story there.

It ain't easy. I know that most journalists writing on the Congo only
have 300-1,000 words or a few radio minutes to explain a mess of a
conflict. I empathize. And many writers do a great job. But there are
also few long, investigative pieces about the conflict that make it
into print. That goes for both Congolese and foreign writers. I am
convinced that there is a market for intelligent, well-crafted pieces
that do not reduce Congolese to a good-guys-bad-guys morality play. So
let's raise the bar.

END
______________________
John Ashworth

Sudan Advisor
Sudan Ecumenical Forum

[email protected]

+254 725 926 297 (Kenya mobile)
+249 919 695 362 (Sudan mobile)
+27 82 853 3556 (South Africa mobile)
+44 750 304 1790 (UK/international)

PO Box 52002 - 00200, Nairobi, Kenya

This is a personal e-mail address and the contents do not necessarily
reflect the views of any organisation

--
The content of this message does not necessarily reflect John
Ashworth's views. Unless explicitly stated otherwise, John Ashworth is
not the author of the content and the source is always cited.

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "sudan-john-ashworth" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.co.za/group/sudan-john-ashworth

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JFD 
info" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/jfdinfo?hl=en.

Reply via email to