Crisis in Côte d’Ivoire: What impact on women?
Massan d’Almeida
2011-03-03, Issue 519
http://pambazuka.org/en/category/features/71362

Printer friendly version

cc UN PhotoCôte d’Ivoire has been in a political impasse since the
declaration of contested results of a second round of presidential
elections held in November 2010. Since both candidates claimed victory
and have been sworn in, the country has two presidents and two
governments. In order to understand the impact of this situation on
women and women’s rights organisations, AWID (Association for Women’s
Rights in Development) spoke with two women’s rights defenders, Mata
Coulibaly, president of SOS EXCLUSION and Honorine Sadia Vehi Toure,
president of Génération femmes du troisième millénaire (GFM3), as well
as with an Ivorian politician who prefers to remain anonymous and to
whom we have given the pseudonym of Sophie.
On 28 November 2010, Côte d’Ivoire held a second round of presidential
elections, following a first round which took place in October 2010
after several postponements. Fourteen[1] candidates participated in
the first round, and Alassane Ouattara and Laurent Gbagbo, the two
candidates who garnered the most votes, made it to the second round of
the polls. Gbagbo is the incumbent president. After the elections, the
Independent Electoral Commission declared Ouattara the winner, but
these results were invalidated by the Ivorian Constitutional Court
which declared his rival, Gbagbo, the president-elect of Côte
d’Ivoire.

This precipitated a crisis in the country. Gbagbo ‘refused to yield to
international pressure and withdraw from his position’[2] in favour of
Ouattara, who was recognised by the entire international community.

Mata Coulibaly and Honorine Sadia Vehi Toure, the two women’s rights
advocates whom we interviewed, explained how the population is
experiencing this situation: ‘We are going through a crisis and this
is very difficult. There is tension in the country. Our days are
filled with uncertainty because at any moment, a strike can be
called,’ said Coulibaly. Toure added: ‘This is a real crisis and we
are under tremendous stress. We do not know what tomorrow will bring.
The social situation is deteriorating day by day. So it is highly
stressful and frustrating.’

The political crisis in Côte d’Ivoire has had major diplomatic,
financial, economic and social repercussions on the population,
including on women and the organisations that defend their rights.

Gbagbo’s refusal to step down has prompted several international
organizations, including the United Nations, the European Union, the
African Union and the Economic Community of West Africa States
(ECOWAS) to take punitive measures against him, his family and close
friends, and the state.

IMPACT OF THE CRISIS ON THE DAILY LIVES OF IVORIANS

The economic cost of Côte d’Ivoire’s conflict between 2002 and 2007
was severe: the gross domestic product (GDP) per person dropped by 15
per cent between 2000 and 2006 and poverty consequently increased.
Côte d’Ivoire’s rank in the Human Development Index (HDI) dropped from
154 in 1999 to 166 in 2007,[3] and later rose to 149 in 2010.[4]
Before the post-electoral crisis, the economic outlook for Côte
d’Ivoire seemed to have improved, with a growth of 3.8 per cent in
2009 and optimistic forecasts for an increase of revenue from cocoa
and petroleum exports.

The current crisis aggravates a rather precarious situation and has
accentuated the impoverishment of the population. It has had a serious
impact on the daily lives of Ivorian households, causing prices of
essential products to rise sharply and encouraging speculation.[5] As
Toure emphasised: ‘Market prices have soared so much that some
essential products such as oil, sugar, meat and onions are difficult
to obtain. This is a real hardship for households. Before the crisis,
many female-headed households could only afford one meal a day, so one
can only imagine how much more difficult it is now for those families.
Everyone is suffering.’

Coulibaly added: ‘Life seems to go in slow motion. Prices have soared.
For example, sometimes there is a shortage of natural gas. A quantity
of coal that previously cost CFAF100 now costs CFAF200. A kilo of
‘oignon dur’* has increased from CFAF450 to CFAF1,000 while onions
from Niamey have increased from CFAF600 to CFAF1,500, and a kilo of
beetroots from CFAF1,900 to CFAF3,000. These examples illustrate the
impact of this crisis on the shopping basket and this price increase
has a tangible impact on the living conditions of Ivorians. Salaries
remain the same although prices are surging. This situation forces
women to economize more in order to feed their families. Regardless of
whether it is a woman or man who is the head of household, everyone
has similar difficulties to overcome.’ Sophie confirmed that some food
prices have doubled, while those of other products, such as oil, have
tripled. She said that it is extremely difficult for middle-income
households to feed themselves because everything has become so
expensive.

The situation is no different in other cities and towns in the
country. Coulibaly stated: ‘The current crisis has affected the whole
Ivorian territory. In Korhogo in the north, Bouaké in the centre of
the country, and Man and Duokoué in the west, food prices have almost
doubled. The population is tired and is growing poorer every day. In
addition, the private sector is threatened with redundancies, which
could lead to famine for parts of the population. We have just learned
that with the closure of the Abidjan and San Pedro ports, we will run
out of gas in a few days. Côte d’Ivoire exports all its products.
Another concern is that HIV/AIDS patients are no longer provided with
anti-retroviral drugs and this has resulted in a proliferation of the
disease and the aggravation of existing cases.’

Toure paints a similar picture of the situation, stating:
‘Impoverishment is felt by everyone throughout the territory. Before
the elections, the country had not yet unified and therefore in the
central, northern and western areas, the living conditions were
already poor. The south was not spared, but it suffered to a lesser
degree. But now I can assure you that now no area is better than
another. Whether it be towns, villages, urban or rural areas, it is
the same unbearable situation all over.’

VIOLENCE, RIGHTS AND SECURITY VIOLATIONS OF HUMAN RIGHTS ADVOCATES

After the first, relatively peaceful round of elections at the end of
October 2010, reports of violence and abuse in different regions of
the country began to emerge. These incidents indicated a serious
deterioration of the general human rights situation and are a reminder
of the atrocities committed during the last decade. African, European
and American human rights organisations, in particular Human Rights
Watch (HRW) and Amnesty International, have repeatedly sounded the
alarm about the situation.

The United Nations Human Rights Council held a special session on Côte
d’Ivoire in Geneva on 23 December 2010, during which the US Secretary
of State Hillary Clinton made a speech and the High Commissioner on
Human Rights Navi Pillay strongly condemned the human rights
violations committed in Côte d’Ivoire. The Office of the Prosecutor of
the International Criminal Court (ICC) has also voiced its concerns
about the situation.

Most of the violence reported to date is carried out during night
raids led by the security forces and other groups in the
neighbourhoods of Abidjan that are considered to be predominantly
populated by Ouattara’s supporters. Human rights organisations have
noted a series of kidnappings under similar circumstances. The victims
of these kidnappings were declared missing or were found dead.[6]
Coulibaly confirmed this stating: ‘Acquaintances of ours have been
kidnapped.’ According to Sophie, these are ‘raids that are violent,
ethnic-based and politically motivated, targeted against individuals
or groups of people whose neighbours have informed on them. The
perpetrators are mercenaries who are paid to commit these murders.’

According to independent sources, human rights and women’s rights
activists are living in a state of constant anxiety with respect to
their safety. An experienced civil society advocate, who requested to
remain anonymous, told IRIN: ‘I have been in hiding ever since being
threatened over two weeks ago. Sometimes, it looks as though the
situation is about to calm down. This is often the impression in the
daytime, but one never knows what will happen once night falls.’[7]
Toure confirmed: ‘We are working within a context of fear. We are
truly sad about what is happening in our country. We cannot carry out
our work openly for fear of reprisals. In spite of this, we are
working, relying on God, and hoping that our country will rapidly
overcome this situation.’ Coulibaly stated: ‘As a representative of
the Democracy and Human Rights Fund (FDDH), I do not feel safe.’

IMPACT OF THE CRISIS ON WORK ON WOMEN’S RIGHTS

The punitive sanctions imposed on Côte d'Ivoire have had a very
negative impact on non-governmental organisations that depend mainly
on international funds for their survival. Toure explained that most
of their financial partners in the United Nations system and the World
Bank have closed their offices, which has in turn forced the NGOs to
suspend most of their activities. Furthermore, due to political
instability, it is increasingly difficult to operate as normal.
Coulibaly stated: ‘Nothing is sure. We have to tailor our plans
according to how events evolve. We are afraid to go to work and
sometimes we receive information or hear rumours that cause us to stay
away from work.’

OTHER RAMIFICATIONS OF THE CRISIS: THE WIDENING OF THE DIVISION

The riots that broke out in September 2002 in Côte d’Ivoire divided
the country between the south, run by the Gbagbo government, and the
north, controlled by rebel forces led by Guillaume Soro, the current
prime minister in the Ouattara administration. However, in 2008, after
signing the Ouagadougou Agreement, the country began a reunification
process, which led to the consensual organisation of the recent
presidential elections.

However, some people are afraid that the alliance between Soro and
Ouattara will cause a revival of the divisions, and will introduce a
religious dimension to the divide. Nonetheless, it should be
emphasized that there are different opinions on this subject, as
highlighted by Toure. ‘No matter what is being said, the people in
Côte d’Ivoire do not promote division,’ she said. ‘It is the
politicians who have put us into this situation because of their
personal interests. In the south, there are Christians and Muslims,
and there are also people from the north, and we live together in
harmony, at least those who have understood that division does not
suit us, which is most of us. The same is true in the north.
Therefore, there is no real division in Côte d’Ivoire, even if this is
what they want you to believe. Ivorians have suffered through ten
years of crisis. In the end, everyone was tired of this. Our will to
leave it behind was shown by the high voter turnout in the elections:
83 per cent in the first round and over 70 per cent in the second
round.’ However, Coulibaly does not agree: ‘The division is
inevitable. The politicians accuse the people of the north of being
rebels. Women are divided in the markets. Some pro-Gbagbo market women
tell their pro-Ouattara counterparts to ask their leader to build them
their own market.’

The current situation in Côte d’Ivoire is worrying. The Ivorian
population, which underwent almost a decade of crisis, strongly
desires that a peaceful outcome to this situation be found quickly for
the benefit of everyone. Human and women’s rights organisations are
particularly affected because funding opportunities for their work are
becoming scarce. Furthermore, growing fears for their personal safety
reduce their capacity to engage, and very few of them dare to openly
express their analysis of the situation. Coulibaly confided to AWID
(Association for Women’s Rights in Development) that, as far as she
knew, no public action has been undertaken by human rights
organisations and that only the Civil Society Agreement of Côte
d’Ivoire (CSCI), which is a leading organisation in the country, has
made proposals for a solution. Other organisations prefer not to issue
statements because they do not share the same point of view or
analysis of the situation. However, Toure stated that there are
discreet initiatives being carried out by around 20 organisations and
women’s networks to encourage the two protagonists to protect the
lives of women and children, and to seek a peaceful outcome to the
crisis.

BROUGHT TO YOU BY PAMBAZUKA NEWS

* This article was first published by the Association for Women's
Rights in Development.
* Please send comments to [email protected] or comment online at
Pambazuka News.

NOTES

* Literally ‘hard onion’ – a variety of onion common in Cote d’Ivoire.

REFERENCES

[1] RFI, 
http://www.rfi.fr/afrique/20101028-cote-ivoire-trois-favoris-passent-attaque
[2] IRIN, Côte d’Ivoire: La pression de l’économie – Compte rendu,
http://www.irinnews.org/fr/ReportFrench.aspx?ReportID=91589
[3] Ibid.
[4] PNUD, http://hdr.undp.org/en/media/HDR_2010_FR_Tables_reprint.pdf
[5] France 24, http://www.france24.com/fr/
[6] IRIN, Côte d’Ivoire: Violations des droits de l’homme – Compte
rendu, http://www.irinnews.org/fr/ReportFrench.aspx?ReportID=91604
[7] Ibid.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Readers' Comments
Let your voice be heard. Comment on this article.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JFD 
info" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/jfdinfo?hl=en.

Reply via email to