Q+A - Can south Sudan violence derail peace?

By Opheera McDoom, KHARTOUM

SSN: KHARTOUM, March 22 (Reuters) - Sudan's south has erupted in
deadly clashes between the army and many militias centered in oil-rich
areas, killing hundreds this year and sparking fears of instability
ahead of the region's expected independence in July.

The U.N. Security Council on Monday held a closed-door meeting on the
violence and the disputed Abyei region, where clashes have threatened
a 2005 north-south peace deal.

Here are some questions and answers on the recent violence.

WHO ARE THE MILITIA?

George Athor, a senior southern army (SPLA) commander who broke away
after disputing April 2010 elections, says he is coordinating fighters
in the oil-producing states of Unity, Upper Nile and Jonglei where he
is based. He says the soldiers left the SPLA, disillusioned with its
democratic credentials. Other militias are vigilante forces formed to
protect local communities in the south's rural security vacuum, where
civilians are heavily armed after decades of civil war. The south's
dominant party, the SPLM, says the fighters are armed by the north.

WHY NOW?

Southerners voted overwhelmingly in a January referendum for secession
from the rest of Sudan, but the SPLM says Khartoum wants to
destabilize the south ahead of independence to keep it weak and under
the thumb of the more developed north. Some 75 percent of Sudan's
500,000 barrels per day of oil comes from southern wells. Khartoum
denies any support for militias.

Critics of the SPLM say an amnesty it granted for rebels last year was
only to ensure the January secession referendum went smoothly. Some of
the militias had gathered in locations designated by the army as a
prelude to integrating them into official forces.

"In all these instances of fighting, without exception, the SPLA
attacked. You gave someone a designated place and then you attack them
-- why would you do that?" said southern opposition politician Lam
Akol.

Two diplomatic sources in Khartoum told Reuters the SPLA had decided
to rout the armed groups militarily rather than talk.

COULD THE VIOLENCE SPARK FRESH CIVIL WAR?

Khartoum exploited existing ethnic southern tensions, arming proxy
militias during the north-south civil war that ended in a 2005 peace
deal. While the SPLM says Khartoum has renewed this policy and it has
documents to prove it, the north denies this.

The violence has hardened positions on talks on the mechanics of
secession -- the two sides are far apart on agreeing a joint border,
sharing oil, and on the status of the disputed Abyei region where
satellite images have shown troops massing from both sides.

While neither side can afford a return to all-out war given their
dependence on oil revenues, Abyei is still a major bone of contention
which could reignite localized conflict.

WILL THE VIOLENCE THREATEN THE NEW STATE?

South Sudan has little infrastructure and a heavily armed population
prone to ethnic tensions. The government has failed to extend control
to rural areas, leaving security vacuums.

The dense forests are conducive to guerrilla warfare, so the SPLM is
unlikely to successfully resolve rebellions militarily.

If it does not adopt an inclusive approach to south-south dialogue the
new state could become unstable, discouraging investment and even
donor aid, which it will desperately need to develop state
institutions.

WHAT ABOUT ABYEI?

Abyei's disputed status has the potential to derail peace and the U.N.
Security Council prioritized this in Monday's talks.

Abyei's referendum on whether to join the north or south is unlikely
to happen as the former foes cannot agree on who will vote. The region
lies along the north-south border near Sudan's largest oil fields.

Neither side looks willing to compromise, troops have amassed from
both sides and, if emotions rise, logic could go out of the window and
spark a wider conflict. The international community wants a solution
before the south's secession takes place in July.

(Editing by Mark Trevelyan)

COMMENTS, PLEASE CLICK HERE

Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the
author(s) and do not represent those of the website.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JFD 
info" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/jfdinfo?hl=en.

Reply via email to