Genocide-Free Investing? JPMorgan Chase Isn't So Sure It’s Necessary
Posted by Laura Heaton on Apr 15, 2011

This post originally appeared on Change.org's Human Rights blog.

If you knew your family savings or retirement funds were financing a
government’s genocidal campaign, would you keep sending money?

JPMorgan Chase is faced with this question right now.

Next month, JPMorgan Chase’s shareholders will decide whether they
want the company to adopt a genocide free investing policy and avoid
investing in companies that “substantially contribute to genocide or
crimes against humanity, the most egregious violations of human
rights.”

So far, the financial services firm has been defensive, filing a “no
action” request to the Securities and Exchange Commission in a bid to
avoid putting a potential genocide-free policy to a vote. The SEC
denied the request.

On its website, JPMorgan Chase touts its strong corporate social
responsibility policies, with a human rights policy that claims to
avoid backing offenders.

But the company’s holdings in PetroChina, worth $1.3 billion, are a
stark contradiction. “PetroChina, through its closely related parent,
China National Petroleum Company, is internationally recognized as the
worst offender helping fund the Government of Sudan's genocide in
Darfur,” states the shareholder proposal.

That the question is up for a vote at all marks a success for the
volunteer-run group Investors Against Genocide.

Investors Against Genocide works to convince financial firms to commit
to ensuring that their investments do not enable human rights crimes.
The group’s shareholder proposal with JPMorgan Chase is just one in a
series of actions spearheaded to raise awareness about the link
between U.S. firms and state-sponsored violence – particularly in the
Darfur region of Sudan – and to compel investors to take
responsibility for how their money is spent.

“Americans, once they become aware, do not want their pensions and
family savings connected to genocide,” said Eric Cohen, chairperson of
Investors Against Genocide. “While financial institutions may oppose
it, ordinary investors who see the proposal will vote their values and
support genocide-free investing. Thanks to the ruling by the
Securities and Exchange Commission, shareholders at JPMorgan Chase
will have a rare opportunity to vote on this important social issue.”

According to research conducted by KRC Research and highlighted by
Cohen in a publication last year, 88 percent of Americans don’t want
their investments tied to genocide. Nearly as many said they would
withdraw their investments from U.S. firms who do business with
companies directly or indirectly supporting genocide.

But while the numbers suggest shareholder proposals like those
supported by Investors Against Genocide would have sweeping successes,
in reality the process for voting in new policies often skews toward
the status quo. Reporting on previous campaigns, Investors Against
Genocide frames the outcome in a positive light: Proposals “submitted
to a variety of mutual funds from companies such as Fidelity and
Vanguard have earned as much as 31 percent of the votes despite strong
opposition from management and voting rules which significantly favor
management.”

The task of putting the genocide-free issue on the agenda of
shareholders in a meaningful way is a challenging one, but Cohen
sounded resolute.

“Since JPMorgan holds a shareholder meeting every year, unlike most
mutual funds, we’ll now have an annual opportunity to raise awareness
of the problem of JPMorgan’s large holdings in PetroChina and the
absence of a policy at JPMorgan to avoid investments tied to
genocide,” he said.

Investors Against Genocide’s message is clear: JPMorgan Chase, stop
supporting companies that finance genocide now and adopt a genocide
free investing policy, or expect to keep hearing from us until you do.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JFD 
info" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/jfdinfo?hl=en.

Reply via email to