For U.N. in Abyei, Mounting Doubts about Legitimacy
Posted by Mayank Bubna on Apr 19, 2011

As troops from both the SAF and SPLA continue to swell in the Abyei
region, U.N. peacekeepers there face perhaps their toughest test yet
to try and contain a potential North-South war. Judging from internal
U.N. reports and recent interviews on the ground, inaction in Abyei
has cost the U.N. peacekeepers precious credibility with the local
population that once lost will be very difficult to regain.

Internal U.N. reports seen by Enough suggest that the mission has hit
an all-time low in its association with the local populace, with the
likelihood of repairing this fractured engagement growing slimmer by
the day. An incident in early March when protestors broke down the
gates of the U.N. compound in Abyei and damaged several vehicles
epitomizes the turbulent bonds that the U.N. shares with Abyei’s
citizens. It is also part of a larger trend that exposes the
increasing difficulties that the U.N. has been facing to try and save
face in a highly volatile area.

Earlier this year, in parts of northern Jonglei and Upper Nile,
members of the SPLA effectively prevented U.N. military observers from
patrolling the “no-go” areas where the southern army is undertaking
military operations against the forces of George Athor, a rebel
leader. In a similar incident, U.N. officials were temporarily stopped
from going to various counties in Unity state where the SPLA are
engaged in a battle against militia leaders Gatluak Gai and Matthew
Pul Jang. In Abyei, UNMIS has fared the worst; armed nomads and
security forces in the region have regularly threatened U.N. troops.
There has also been at least one instance when troops in a Zambian-led
patrol were accosted and had their weapons confiscated.

Contrary to popular belief, UNMIS has a strong mandate, including
Chapter VII authorization to use force if necessary to protect
civilians under imminent threat of physical violence. Nevertheless,
time and again U.N. peacekeepers have demonstrated a tendency of
avoiding involvement in dispute resolution at the ground level, often
lamenting a lack of strong enough political will to counter security
threats towards civilians. In the attack on the U.N. compound in
Abyei, the head of office claimed that the attack was directed not at
the U.N.; rather, it was local grievance over the visit of northern
intelligence chief Salah Gosh who was in the U.N. compound at the
time. Interviews with civilians suggest however, that the violence was
a reflection of pent up frustration at the U.N.’s perceived bias
towards the North.

“During the recent crisis in Abyei, UNMIS had evidence of militias and
SAF forces attacking civilians but took no action,” said Acting Chief
Administrator Mario Kuol.

“The U.N. here is totally useless,” said Charles Abyei, the speaker of
Abyei’s legislative assembly. “It is divided. Some people within the
mission are aligned with the NCP. Others, with the SPLM. No one is
neutral. So, one cannot talk of an effective role of the U.N. here.”

For their part, UNMIS officials assert that in an environment where
they are trying to carefully balance their dual role as peacekeepers
and diplomats, theirs is often a difficult choice. But for Abyei’s
residents, the U.N.’s attempt to maintain neutrality is meaningless in
a conflict that involves two unequal sides.

“The NCP is not a real partner in the peace process. They plot to kill
the Ngok Dinka,” said Kuol. “UNMIS is aware of the presence of
militias here in Abyei and South Kordofan. They have seen them come
from the North in military helicopters and heavily armed, yet they
remain silent.”

The most recent crises in Abyei involving the burning of three
villages and the subsequent inaction of the U.N. in Abyei left people
with a further sense of disillusionment about the U.N.’s role in
Abyei. “There are two U.N.s in our minds – one in New York and the one
here in Abyei,” said Dr. Rau, a civil society leader, referring to a
disconnect between the formulation of Security Council resolutions and
their implementation on the ground. “In 2008 and now, lives have been
lost and property looted and burned, yet they have failed to
intervene. I don’t know what is their definition of crisis. The U.N.
should just pack and go.”



Darfur and Southern Sudan Prevention Protection United Nations

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JFD 
info" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/jfdinfo?hl=en.

Reply via email to