Nuer marginalization in South Sudan a false claim – minister
* Article
* Comments (21)
email Email
print Print
pdfSave
separation
increase
decrease
separation
separation
*
*
*
*
April 26, 2011 (JUBA) – A senior official in the semi-autonomous
Government of Southern Sudan (GoSS), has described as ‘baseless
allegation’ any claims by members of the Nuer ethnic group that they
have been marginalized by the Dinka-led government in South Sudan.
JPEG - 93.6 kb
John Luk Jok, GOSS Minister of Legal Affairs and Constitutional
Development (Photo Sudan Vote)
John Luk Jok, the minister of Legal Affairs and Constitutional
Development in GoSS and also a member of the Nuer community, which is
the second largest ethnic group in South Sudan after the Dinka, said
he was disturbed by false claims he hears from the community members
that the Nuer are being marginalized in the government. He made the
remarks while addressing thousands of Christian members in the Nuer
congregation of the Presbyterian Church in Juba during the Easter
celebrations on Sunday.
Luk who strongly criticized the Nuer military leaders who have
rebelled, including Peter Gatdet, because of alleged exercise of
tribalism in the government, said those rebels did not understand that
they were running away from the government in which the Nuer have a
significant representation.
“We [Nuer] have seven ministers and also the post of the Vice
President in the Government of Southern Sudan, and yet you complain of
being marginalized. That is not true at all,” he told the
congregation.
Luk said while others fear the fact that the Nuer soldiers are by far
the majority in South Sudan army, the SPLA, and their officers are in
command of most of the brigades and units deployed across South Sudan,
yet those of Peter Gatdet still run away from the very army.
“The SPLA Chief of General Staff, James Hoth Mai, is also son of the
Nuer community. The Nuer sons and daughters are the majority in the
SPLA in the whole of South Sudan. Even if you go to Greater Bahr
Ghazal itself, you will find that most of the soldiers and officers in
charge of the SPLA forces in the field are from Nuer,” he further
explained.
The minister appealed to the Nuer community to try to convince their
sons and daughters who have rebelled against the government to abandon
the rebellion and come back to the system. He expressed concern that
the violent situation is becoming Nuer fighting against Nuer on both
sides.
“Now because the rebels are mostly composed of Nuer fighters, and the
SPLA is equally mostly composed of Nuer sons and daughters, when the
rebels confront the SPLA, it will be the same sons of Nuer in the SPLA
that will fight them,” Luk lamented.
Major General Peter Gatdet rebelled against the government and decided
to wage war in Unity state, killing his own people, he said. Luk
further explained that the commander in charge of the army’s Division
Four in Unity state, Major General Gatduel Gatluak, is also a Nuer and
is the one currently clashing with Peter Gatdet. The same situation
with Gabriel Tanginya, a Nuer, whose forces clashed on Saturday with
the SPLA forces in Jonglei state, commanded by another Nuer, SPLA
Brigadier General Gatwech Gai.
He recalled a similar situation during the inception of the SPLM/A in
1983, when the movement was fighting against Nuer forces of those of
late Samuel Gai Tut and Gordon Koang Chol, of Anya-nya II, during
which the Nuer were also the majority in the SPLA’s early years.
The minister’s public concerns attracted a lot of reactions from
members of the congregation after the Sunday’s Easter celebrations.
“I do agree with the minister that we as a community or Christians
should discourage armed rebellions against our government anywhere and
by any community,” commented a junior government official from the
Nuer community who wanted to remain anonymous.
“Of course, we as Nuer have the post of the Vice President and the
seven ministers in GoSS, in addition to the army Chief of Staff who
represent us in the government and army.”
He however said the minister should not generalize the whole Nuer
community as warmongers just because of individuals who decided to
rebel. “You know, it is not right to blame a community as a whole as
if it is responsible for the rebellion of individual military officers
who happen to come from the community,” he cautioned.
He said some other communities have individual senior officers who
have rebelled against the government such as General George Athor from
Dinka ethnic group, Olony from Shilluk and David Yauyau from Murle.
“As the minister himself did correctly confirm that the Nuer officers
are the majority in charge of SPLA forces in the field, and since
those majority Nuer officers and soldiers deployed in the ten states
of South Sudan have not rebelled like Peter Gatdet, then any rebellion
of a single or few individual officers should not be seen as
community-based,” he argued.
“There is a point His Excellency John Luk has missed though I
generally agree with his advice against violence and all that,” said
another commentator. “I think people like Peter Gatdet did not rebel
on behalf of the Nuer community. If they say they are fighting against
corruption and tribalism, then that corruption is not only affecting
the Nuer community and tribalism may not necessarily mean tribalism
against the Nuer in particular. It could be against other minority
tribes, which Gatdet might have seen being marginalized and wanted to
fight on their behalf,” he inquired.
He said he read in the media that the rebels were talking about the
type of constitution for transition they want to see implemented on
July 9 and the rights of other political parties in South Sudan. “Is
Nuer community representing the constitution and the other political
parties which the rebels talked about?” he asked.
“Yes, minister John Luk’s advice is very good for the community.
Sometimes we have our sons who think they are always available to
fight on behalf of others and that always puts our community at the
disadvantage,” said an elder.
He further exemplified that while others in South Sudan submitted to
the system of British colony a century ago, the Nuer took up the
challenge of defending their territories until the British was
discouraged from continuing with its colonial mission to South Sudan
and left. “That was the beginning of disadvantages to our community
because we were historically condemned by the British, then the Arabs,
and denied us access to education for fear of developing us into
future educated defenders of ours and others rights in South Sudan,”
he further explained.
The elder further emphasized on the consequences of war against
development, saying the senior government officials from the Nuer
community should support peaceful dialogue with the rebels to end the
confrontations.
“We can be proud of our courageous history that we had a visionary
prophet, Ngundeng; we were the first community in Africa to be bombed
using planes during our courageous encounter with the British; and
also the first to bring down a plane used by the British during the
encounters,” he said, adding, but the situation disadvantaged us in
terms of access to education, which we are not proud of,” he
continued.
He further advised that it is time for children of the Nuer community
to go to school like the rest without their security being violated by
rebels from the community. “I support dialogue with the rebels to end
the violence. John Luk was right that it is becoming a Nuer-Nuer
confrontation. May be that was what our Vice President, Riek Machar,
warned would happen and therefore was not for war against the militias
or rebels but preferred peaceful dialogue with them,” he said.
The elder also warned that the violence between the SPLA and the
rebels can quickly turn into tribal war if the rebels, commanded by
Peter Gatdet or any other Nuer rebel, carry out attacks into states or
areas inhabited by other ethnic communities.
He said since the Nuer have the positions already mentioned in the
government, they are therefore better off than the rest and would as
well “eat their share silently.”
“Yes, John Luk is right. Why are the rest who are more disadvantaged
not rebelling?” asked a university student. Let me tell you this
shocking fact, even the Dinka tribe that some Nuer are collectively
blaming for allegedly dominating the government and corrupting it
don’t make their people in their home counties to benefit from what
they have looted in terms of development? They eat the money here in
Juba and send the bulk of the money like refugees to foreign banks
abroad in East Africa, Europe or Australia and may get confiscated
from there one day,” he said.
“We would be victimizing the whole Dinka population for no reason
because, during my routine visits to Lakes and Warrap states, people
are still walking half naked in their villages; no schools, no
hospitals, no agricultural schemes, no roads or any sign of
considerable civilization that can be brought to their home areas by
any form of organized tribal corruption.”
He said the Nuer officers should not rebel this time but wait
patiently for implementation of federal system after July 9 when, he
explained, Juba will no longer control much of the resources coming
from the states, during which the rich states will compete with others
using large share of their own resources, and work to minimize
corruption.
The university student said the type of corruption in South Sudan is
not an organized tribal corruption, but a selfish one which only
benefits few individuals at the expense of even their own ethnic
groups.
“You see, in some other African countries that have corrupt
tribal-based leaderships, they loot the wealth of that nation in order
to invest it and develop their home towns and villages,” adding that
this is always to benefit populations of their ethnic groups on the
ground in order to have economic upper hand over other ethnic groups.
“But this is not happening with the type of corruption we talk about
in South Sudan. So, I don’t call it Dinka or Nuer marginalization of
others or organized Dinka tribal corruption because 99% of their
populations have not benefited from the looted resources for the last
six years,” he further observed.
He said it is a small clique of people from various ethnic groups,
including Nuer and Dinka that have been squandering the resources of
the nation without even benefiting the bulk of their respective ethnic
populations in their constituencies.
However, another Juba university student partially disagreed with the
view of his colleague. “First of all, I do agree that corruption in
South Sudan should not be blamed on a single tribe, such as the Dinka
as an organized act, but the son of that community who happens to be
the president should be held responsible for condoning corrupt
practices,” he argued.
He further argued that because the president is the only top official
in government with the constitutional power to appoint, assign and
remove senior government executive officials and army and police
officers, he should be blamed for appointing some wrong people or
condoning corrupt practices for the last six years, despite his zero
tolerance policy on corruption.
He further explained that since the president [Salva Kiir] happens to
come from the Dinka ethnic group, people from other ethnic groups also
assume that when things go wrong under his watchful eyes, that
condoning leadership style on corruption and other matters also
represents the collective attitude of the Dinka ethnic group as a
whole.
“Some people say maybe if somebody else from a different ethnic group
becomes president with such constitutional powers to appoint, assign
and remove officials, maybe that person could use that constitutional
power to make things change better by effectively following up
implementation of good policies,” he said. He added that this view is
where the blame is put on the president, which is then perceived to be
representing his community’s interest when not acting to prosecute
senior corrupt officials such as the former two GoSS finance ministers
who happened to hail from the Dinka community.
He also blamed the Nuer senior officials in the government, including
John Luk, for allegedly not being proactive in influencing the
government’s security strategy in South Sudan, which he said should
include recommendation of peaceful dialogue with any militias or
rebels as the solution to end the violence before 9 July.
“If minister John Luk and his colleagues in government are seriously
concerned about the violence between the SPLA and the rebels which
kills sons of the Nuer community from both sides, then let them turn
away the guns which are aimed at the Nuer community by strongly
recommending peaceful dialogue with the militias or rebels,” he said.
(ST)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JFD
info" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/jfdinfo?hl=en.
