U.S. & AU express concern over situation in Sudan’s Abyei
ArticleComments (3). Email PrintSave
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

May 5, 2011 (KHARTOUM) – The United States and the African Union (AU)
today voiced concern over the growing tensions in the oil-rich region
of Abyei that lies on the borders of North and South Sudan.


FILE - A UNMIS peacekeeper patrol on APC in Abyei, Sothern Sudan,
Friday, March 11, 2011 (AP)South Sudan will become an independent
state next July after the referendum that took place earlier this year
resulted in a landslide vote in favor of splitting from the rest of
the country.

But the dispute over Abyei remained a sticky point along with other
post-referendum arrangements that are still being negotiated.

Abyei residents were supposed to have a referendum in January over
whether to join the north or south. Disagreement over who is eligible
to vote derailed that ballot and talks over the status of the region
have stalled.

"The United States remains deeply concerned about the alarming
situation in the Abyei region of Sudan. U.S. Special Envoy for Sudan
Ambassador Princeton Lyman met jointly with African Union High-Level
Implementation Panel Member President Pierre Buyoya as well as UN
Special Representative for the – of the Secretary General for Sudan
Haile Menkerios, and Sudanese First Vice President Salva Kiir this
morning on this issue," U.S. State Department spokesman Mark Toner
told reporters on Thursday.

"Recent actions by both parties to the 2005 Comprehensive Peace
Agreement run counter to President Bashir and President Kiir’s
agreement to resolve the situation peacefully through negotiation and
with the assistance of the African Union High-Level Implementation
Panel. The introduction of armed forces into Abyei by both sides
violates the Comprehensive Peace Agreement and recently resulted in a
violent clash in which Southern forces apparently killed at least 11
members of the Northern Joint Integrated Unit," he added.

This week a Sudanese army convoy clashed with Southern forces in Abyei
resulting in the death of 14 people, according to UN figures. Both
sides traded blame on who started the fighting.

The U.S. urged both sides to withdraw their troops from the contested
area in line with previous accords signed.

"We welcome the May 5th agreement by the National Congress Party and
Sudan People’s Liberation Movement to immediately implement the
Kadugli Agreements and to withdraw illegal troops from Abyei, and urge
both sides to act expeditiously to carry out this agreement," the U.S.
state department spokesperson said.

The African Union (AU) in a separate statement echoed the U.S.
sentiments and said that the violence occurred as a result of failing
to implement Kadugli accord stressing that any "unauthorized force"
should be withdrawn.

A statement by the United Nations Mission in Sudan (UNMIS) said that
its chief Haile Menkerios got pledges from North and South to
implement the agreements signed. He met with South Sudan president
Salva Kiir in Juba today.

“The two parties have committed that the Kadugli and Abyei Agreements
shall be carried out with the facilitation and participation of the
UN. UNMIS will also support the containment and temporary security
measures while a solution is being sought. We have agreed here to
immediately move on it,” Menkerios said after the meeting.

Complicating the situation is the move by South Sudan government to
assert that Abyei is part of the new state in its constitution. Last
week, Sudanese President Omer Hassan al-Bashir said he would not
recognize south Sudan as an independent state if it that occurred and
said he is prepared to go to war on Abyei.

The U.S. at the time criticized Bashir’s remarks saying that they fuel
tensions further.

(ST)

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JFD 
info" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/jfdinfo?hl=en.

Reply via email to