---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Eric Reeves <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 4:11 AM
Subject: "In Sudan, Genocide Anew?" from The Washington Post, June 18, 2011
To: [email protected]


“In Sudan, Genocide Anew?”

We are, once again, on the verge of genocidal counterinsurgency in
Sudan. History must not be allowed to repeat itself.



from The Washington Post, June 18, 2011

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/in-sudan-genocide-anew/2011/06/17/AGVhCVZH_story.html



   Eric Reeves

By early 2004, it was clear that the ideologically Arabist and
Islamist regime in Khartoum was waging a genocidal counterinsurgency
war throughout the western region of Darfur. Yet months passed before
a broad range of human rights, government and academic voices said as
much, even as the consequences of silence and inaction were
conspicuous. In February 2004 I argued on this page that a "credible
peace forum must be rapidly created. Immediate plans for humanitarian
intervention should begin. The alternative is to allow tens of
thousands of civilians to die in the weeks and months ahead in what
will be continuing genocidal destruction."

This prediction was borne out in the months that followed, the most
destructive phase of the Darfur genocide, in which African tribal
groups were mercilessly targeted by soldiers and militias. Sadly,
mortality from war-related causes continues to mount. But now we are
debating how many hundreds, not tens, of thousands have perished from
war-related causes in Darfur.

Today, another episode of genocidal counterinsurgency is beginning in
another part of Sudan. Absent a vigorous international response, there
will almost certainly be a reprise of ethnically targeted human
destruction in the middle of the country, specifically within the Nuba
Mountains region of South Kordofan, which has a rich mixture of
African inhabitants.

Sudan was ravaged by a north-south civil war from 1983 to 2005; the
war nominally ended with the Comprehensive Peace Agreement, signed by
Khartoum and the southern Sudan People's Liberation Movement (SPLM).
But key terms of the agreement were never fulfilled, among them
"popular consultations" that were to give the people of South Kordofan
a voice in how they were governed. The armed wing of the SPLM was
especially strong in the Nuba Mountains, and Khartoum saw a threat
that it was determined to eliminate.

On June 5 a military campaign began in South Kordofan. It has rapidly
escalated in ferocity as disturbing accounts emerge of the African
people of the Nuba being rounded up in house searches and road
checkpoints, and subjected to indiscriminate aerial bombardment. All
signs point to a new genocide.

It will be similar to the 1990s, when Khartoum declared a jihad
against the peoples of the Nuba (who adhere to a range of religions,
including Islam). Because the mountains are not geographically
contiguous with South Sudan (with which it is militarily, politically
and culturally allied), its people were largely left to fend for
themselves.

The regime imposed a total blockade of humanitarian assistance from
the south. Many starving Nuba were forced into "peace camps," where
receiving food was conditional upon conversion to Islam. Some who
refused were tortured or mutilated. Khartoum's decade-long campaign
killed and displaced hundreds of thousands.

Today, reports from the ground and wire services detail heavy fighting
underway in Kadugli, the capital of South Kordofan, and surrounding
areas. There are multiple reports (including photos) of military
aircraft such as MiG-29s attacking deep in the mountains; on Wednesday
these attacks destroyed the key runway at Kauda, critical for
transporting humanitarian supplies into the Nuba, a disturbing sign of
how Khartoum will prosecute the genocide.

Nearly all humanitarian operations in the region have ceased, as
Khartoum denies the United Nations air clearances; workers for the
U.N. Mission in Sudan have been evacuated or confined to their base.
On June 8 that base was raided by Khartoum's military intelligence,
and the United Nations was effectively disabled.

Khartoum's actions come just days after regime forces seized Abyei,
whose indigenous residents are overwhelmingly Dinka Ngok and see
themselves as part of the South. The 2005 peace agreement promised
them a referendum for self-determination, which Khartoum has aborted.
Last month the regime launched a military attack to seize Abyei; the
U.N. High Commission for Refugees reports that some 100,000 civilians
have fled south - virtually the entire Ngok population. They are
living in extremely difficult conditions, and many will die. A U.N.
report found that Khartoum's actions were "tantamount to ethnic
cleansing," a decisive phrase that senior U.N. officials excised from
later versions of the text.

The U.N. Security Council demanded on June 3 that Khartoum immediately
withdraw its forces from Abyei, but the regime scoffed - as it has at
previous council demands, including those bearing on Darfur. This is
bad news for the people of Abyei and for the prospects of a just and
peaceful separation of Sudan's north and south, which is scheduled for
July 9. For the Nuba people, such fecklessness spells catastrophe.

Too often with Sudan, empty demands and threats signal to the regime
that the world is not serious about halting atrocities. Either the
international community gets serious about preventing further violence
in Abyei and the adjacent region of South Kordofan, or we will again
see "tens of thousands of civilians . . . die in the weeks and months
ahead in what will be continuing genocidal destruction."

Eric Reeves, a professor at Smith College, is the author of "A Long
Day's Dying: Critical Moments in the Darfur Genocide." He is a
consultant to several human rights and humanitarian organizations in
Sudan.

_____________________________
Eric Reeves
Smith College
Northampton, MA 01063

[email protected]
413-585-3326
www.sudanreeves.org

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JFD 
info" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/jfdinfo?hl=en.

Reply via email to