---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Eric Reeves <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 3:50 AM
Subject: "Genocide in the Nuba Mountains of Sudan"
To: [email protected]


"Genocide in the Nuba Mountains of Sudan"

from Dissent Magazine (on-line), June 22, 2011

http://dissentmagazine.org/atw.php?id=479



   By Eric Reeves



The Kauda valley in the very center of the Nuba Mountains of South
Kordofan, Sudan is a beautiful place, one of the most beautiful I've
ever encountered. The hillsides are alive with tukuls (traditional
thatched huts) and terraced landscapes that give the impression of
always having been there---of belonging there. During my days there I
took long walks into the remoter regions of the valley, taking many
pictures and communicating awkwardly with folks I met. My camera
seemed the perfect translation tool, as most of the people I
photographed had never had the experience before, especially the
children. And when they saw themselves---typically for the first time
in their lives---in my flip-out monitor, the inevitable reaction (once
recognition took place---not always an immediate process) was
unconstrained laughter. I'm not sure I understood the laughter, or
that there was much to understand beyond the fact that seeing
themselves was hugely entertaining and out of the ordinary.



I attended a local church service in Kauda town, where I was welcomed
graciously, and every word not sung was laboriously (and in places
bewilderingly) translated for me. This made the service rather long,
but it was a sign of real appreciation. Afterward there was a
beautiful interweaving of communicants, walking in opposite directions
around the church. All the women and children were in colorful finery,
and the men were dressed in their best attire.



But I also attended a much grimmer gathering, in the rocky hillside
well above Kauda: a meeting of Nuba military and civil society
leaders, led by the deputy governor of the region (the governor was in
Nairobi), in a large tent set up for this occasion. They were
determined that I should hear their story, and they were deadly
serious. Again and again I felt the force of decades of anger and
disappointment pushing me back in my seat. I learned firsthand how
bitter the people of the Nuba were, having been left out of
consideration at the time of independence (1956), and in the Addis
Ababa peace agreement (1972) that ended Sudan's first civil war. They
would not be left out of the next peace agreement, they insisted with
a vehemence that was almost shocking, and clearly meant to be conveyed
to those in whose hands their fate rested.



This was in January 2003---shortly after the cessation of hostilities
agreement (October 2002), but well before the Comprehensive Peace
Agreement (January 2005) was signed by Khartoum and the southern Sudan
People's Liberation Movement (SPLM). The Nuba knew that key decisions
were going to be made about their future, and they wanted a voice.
Most of all they wanted self-determination, even as they knew that the
Nuba Mountains were not only in the North but nowhere contiguous with
what will become the Republic of South Sudan on July 9. Their fear was
that they would be left alone in a North Sudan dominated by Khartoum's
ideological Islam and Arabism (the ethnically diverse African people
of the Nuba follow a number of religions, including Islam). Their
worst fears have been realized.



Historical memory in this part of Sudan is defined by the terrible
experiences of the 1990s, when Khartoum mounted a full-scale genocidal
assault on the people of the Nuba, killing and displacing hundreds of
thousands. This was jihad, and it was based on a fatwah issued in
Khartoum in January 1992. With this justification, a total
humanitarian blockade was imposed on the region, and many starving
people were driven into "peace camps," where receiving food was
conditional upon conversion to Islam; those refusing were often
tortured or mutilated. It is hardly surprising that Deputy Governor
Ismael Khamis would tell me bluntly, "Khartoum doesn't regard us as
human beings."



And judging by the nature of the genocide that is rapidly developing
in South Kordofan, there can be little quarreling with Khamis'
assessment. Clear patterns have emerged from the many scores of
reports that have come to me from the region over the past two weeks,
Human Rights Watch has confirmed that Khartoum's regular military and
militia are undertaking a campaign of house-to-house roundups of Nuba
in the capital city of Kadugli. Many of these people are hauled away
in cattle trucks or summarily executed; dead bodies reportedly litter
the streets of Kadugli. The Nuba are also stopped at checkpoints
grimly similar to those in Rwanda; those suspected of SPLM or
"southern" political sympathies are arrested or shot. The real issue,
however, is not political identity but Nuba ethnicity; one aid worker
who recently escaped from South Kordofan reports militia forces
patrolling further from Kadugli: "Those [Nuba] coming in are saying,
'Whenever they see you are a black person, they kill you.'" Another
Nuba aid worker reports that an Arab militia leader made clear that
their orders were simple: "to just clear."



Yet another Nuba resident of Kadugli ("Yusef") told Agence
France-Presse that he had been informed by a member of the notorious
Popular Defense Forces (PDF) that they had been provided with plenty
of weapons and ammunition, and a standing order: "'He said that they
had clear instructions: just sweep away the rubbish. If you see a
Nuba, just clean it up. He told me he saw two trucks of people with
their hands tied and blindfolded, driving out to where diggers were
making holes for graves on the edge of town.'" There have been
repeated reports, so far unconfirmed, of mass graves in and around
Kadugli. We should hardly be surprised that the charges of "ethnic
cleansing" and "genocide" are coming ever more insistently from the
Nuba people, observers on the ground and in the region, and church
groups with strong ties to the region.



Just as shocking is Khartoum's renewed blockade of humanitarian
assistance to the people of the Nuba, hundreds of thousands of whom
have already fled into the hills or mountainsides. The Kauda airstrip,
critical for humanitarian transport, has been relentlessly bombed over
the past ten days, and the UN now reports that it is no longer
serviceable for fixed-wing aircraft. The airstrip has no military
value, as the Sudan People's Liberation Army (SPLA) forces have no
aircraft. The concerted bombing, with high-explosives producing
enormous craters, is simply to deny the Nuba food, medicine, and
shelter.



The same assault on humanitarian efforts is underway in Kadugli and
other towns under Khartoum's military control. The UN World Health
Organization warehouse and offices in Kadugli have been completely
looted, as have those of other UN humanitarian agencies. The Kadugli
airport has been commandeered by Khartoum's military forces, and all
humanitarian flights into South Kordofan have been halted. The World
Food Program has announced that it has no way to feed some 400,000
beneficiaries in South Kordofan. As in Darfur, Khartoum intends to
wage a genocide by attrition---defeating the Nuba by starving them.



What Khartoum seems not to have fully understood is how determined the
Nuba SPLA are. These are not southerners, but true sons of the Nuba;
they cannot "return to the South," because they are from the north.
And they are well armed and well led by Abdel Aziz el-Hilu, a former
governor of the region and fearsome military commander. They believe
they are defending their homeland and their way of life. They have no
alternative: as Khamis said to me during our 2003 meeting, "we have no
way out." Given the geography of South Kordofan, there can be little
quarreling with this assessment. These people will fight to the death.



Princeton Lyman, the U.S. special envoy, declared on June 16---eleven
days after the killing began in Kadugli---that the United States
"doesn't have enough information on the ground to call the campaign
'ethnic cleansing.'" This is an astonishing claim, given what the UN
is saying in its confidential reports on the situation in Kadugli,
what Human Rights Watch has reported, what is revealed by satellite
photography, what escaping aid workers have told journalists, and what
is revealed by photographs of the bombing of the airstrip at Kauda.
Again, the airstrip has no military purpose: it is being attacked
solely to deny humanitarian access to the Nuba people. And it is
working: the World Council of Churches, an organization with close
ties to the Nuba, reported on June 10 that as many as 300,000 people
were besieged and cut off from humanitarian relief.



Yet again the Obama administration is showing a painful lack of
clear-eyed assessment and moral courage in addressing the genocidal
ambitions of the Khartoum regime. This is the President's second
"Rwanda moment," the second moment in which to decide whether or not
halting genocide really matters to this administration. The first
"moment" came early in the form of a decision about how to respond to
undiminished human suffering and destruction in Darfur, about which
Obama now barely speaks, despite his forceful campaign rhetoric: "The
government of Sudan has pursued a policy of genocide in Darfur.
Hundreds of thousands of men, women, and children have been killed in
Darfur, and the killing continues to this very day" (April 2008).
Obama's response was to appoint a special envoy to Sudan, General
Scott Gration, who failed badly and conspicuously with his policy of
accommodating Khartoum’s génocidaires, men he thought would be
impressed by his offer of "cookies, gold stars, and friendly faces."
But as I've repeatedly argued in this forum, conditions on the ground
in Darfur are if anything worse than when Obama issued his
uncompromising words.



This brings us to the present, to this very moment, in which a
decision must be made: acquiesce and settle for stern warnings to
Khartoum, or act forcefully to compel a change in Khartoum's thinking.
A militarily enforced No Fly Zone over South Kordofan---however
desirable---is impracticable for a number of reasons: there is no easy
or obvious solution to the problem of basing the necessary aircraft
(including AWACS, tanker refueling aircraft, and patrolling combat
aircraft); constant mid-flight refueling would present extraordinarily
difficult and expensive challenges; and there appears to be no
possibility of securing either UN backing or even moral support from
the Europeans for such a complex undertaking---let alone domestic
support from a war-weary America.  There is a much less costly but
equally effective alternative, one that could be undertaken
unilaterally if necessary: attacking Khartoum's military aircraft on
the ground, if those aircraft have been implicated in bombing
civilians and humanitarians.  The U.S. should then demand as a
condition for halting these serial attacks an end to hostilities in
South Kordofan, and an opening of humanitarian access.  For despite
Ambassador Lyman's disingenuous claim about our not having enough
information to assess the nature of the atrocity crimes in South
Kordofan, there can be no reasonable doubt about the reality of
widespread, systematic, ethnically targeted destruction of the Nuba
people.



When I think back to my time at Kauda, and the beauty of the people
and the hillsides---now much of it in flames, and all of it under the
most intense assault---there hardly seems to be a choice. But
diffidence, over-commitment, and apparent failure to understand what
is at stake have made for what appears to be a disastrous decision by
Obama in confronting his second "Rwanda moment."



[Eric Reeves has published extensively on Sudan, nationally and
internationally, for more than a decade. He is author of A Long Day’s
Dying: Critical Moments in the Darfur Genocide.]



_____________________________
Eric Reeves
Smith College
Northampton, MA 01063

[email protected]
413-585-3326
www.sudanreeves.org

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JFD 
info" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/jfdinfo?hl=en.

Reply via email to