---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Eric Reeves <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 6:05 AM
Subject: "Abyei and South Kordofan/Nuba Mountains: Under Siege, Deeply at Risk"
To: [email protected]


"Abyei and South Kordofan/Nuba Mountains: Under Siege, Deeply at Risk"



Eric Reeves

July 1, 2011



What are Khartoum's ambitions in South Kordofan and Abyei?  What is
the significance of the two agreements concerning these key regions
signed by representatives of the regime?  The agreement on South
Kordofan (and Blue Nile) declared that in principle Khartoum was
committed to a cessation of hostilities agreement.  But Reuters
reports today that on his return from China, President Omar al-Bashir
made clear that this is yet another agreement signed expediently and
one that he has no intention of honoring (one must surmise that the
Chinese have done little to pressure al-Bashir and the regime to come
to some reasonable diplomatic settlement).  In the "Framework
Agreement" on South Kordofan and Blue Nile (June 28), Nafi'e Ali
Nafi'e---the increasingly powerful senior figure within the National
Islamic Front/National Congress Party---officially committed the
regime "to work to agree both [sic] immediate and sustainable security
arrangements for Southern Kordofan and Blue Nile," specifically an
"Agreement on Cessation of Hostilities in Southern Kordofan."  But
today we heard a rather different commitment:



"Sudan's President Omar Hassan al-Bashir said the army would continue
its campaign in the flashpoint of South Kordofan, state news agency
SUNA said on Friday, dashing hope of a cease-fire ahead of southern
secession. In his first comments since returning from a visit to
China, Bashir seemed to contradict comments by a northern official
this week that north and south had agreed 'in principle' on a
cease-fire in the northern oil state."



"'He directed the armed forces to continue their military operations
in South Kordofan until a cleansing of the region is over,' SUNA
quoted Bashir as telling worshippers during Friday prayers."
(dateline: Khartoum)
http://af.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idAFTRE7605O720110701



Celebration of the agreement by the AU's expedient Thabo Mbeki and the
UN's feckless Ban Ki-Moon would seem distinctly premature.  And in the
absence of a cessation of hostilities agreement, we must ask what this
war will look like going forward. Despite continuing agnosticism on
the part of U.S. special envoy Princeton Lyman about what is occurring
in South Kordofan, the images of aerial destruction continue to pour
out of the region, as do reports of house-to-house arrests and
executions of Nuba civilians; a virtual shutdown of humanitarian
access in the region; a massive build-up of weapons and armor in
Kadugli (capital of South Kordofan); and relentless aerial assaults on
civilians, humanitarians, churches, and other non-military targets in
the Nuba Mountains.



The results of the present campaign have been horrific.  I have
assembled an album of my own photographs from 2003, a time of relative
peace in the Nuba, and photographs from this past month (June 2011),
mainly from Nuba sources.  The latter are images of the war al-Bashir
vows to continue until the Nuba Mountains have been "cleansed."
(Warning: many of the photographs are disturbingly
gruesome---http://goo.gl/5gDpV)



I have also assembled a range of photographs, from various sources,
that chronicle the displacement from Abyei of the Dinka Ngok to the
South, the destruction and looting of Abyei town, as well as the
plight of those displaced to Akok, Turelei, Wau, and other Southern
towns.  As Sudan moves into the heaviest part of the rainy season,
water-borne diseases will become increasingly frequent and dangerous.
A normally optimistic program director for a Western humanitarian
organization, with a long history in this area, informs me that he
sees only a very grim future for these people---http://goo.gl/oAhxE



A great deal of this has been eminently foreseeable.  I argued on March 9, 2011:



"[Khartoum's] military strategy comes ever more clearly into focus:
seize Abyei as far south as possible, then negotiate final status of
the region from a position of military strength...."



"If war resumes in Abyei, it is likely to spread quickly to the Nuba
Mountains in South Kordofan and Southern Blue Nile. The entire
North/South border could become one long military front, particularly
in the oil regions of Unity State and South Kordofan. Unless Khartoum
is sent the clearest possible signal that it will gain nothing by such
offensive military action, including arming and encouraging Misseriya
militias, the fighting in Abyei will increase. The UN peacekeeping
mission (UNMIS) is neither willing nor able to intervene---or even
report on what lies beyond their bases. At this point, UNMIS patrols
are consistently being denied freedom of movement by both the SAF and
SPLA. Heavily armed, Khartoum-backed Misseriya units continue
marauding throughout much of Abyei."

("Obama Weak on the Rapidly Escalating Crisis in Abyei," Dissent
Magazine (on-line), March 9, 2011
http://dissentmagazine.org/atw.php?id=396 )



All this has come to pass because the international community, and
especially the U.S. as guided by special envoy Lyman, has refused to
see Khartoum's ambitions for what they are, refused to assess on a
realistic basis what would deter the regime from war-making that even
in early March was clearly in the offing.



It has also come to pass despite the grim history of the genocidal
jihad directed against the Nuba people during the 1990s, a history
that should do much more to inform the thinking of special envoy
Lyman, who casually declared in response to a question about whether
the Nuba Mountains might become a "new Darfur":



"I don't think so for two reasons. One because the Nuba Mountain
people are fighting back and I don't think the North is capable of
dislodging large numbers of people on an ethnic basis from the Nuba
Mountains. That's the reality on the ground. Second, I'm not sure
that's the objective of the government though local commanders may
have a different point of view."



But of course the Nuba people "fought back" heroically in the 1990s;
even so, hundreds of thousands died (mostly from starvation and
disease) and hundreds of thousands were displaced from their rich
farmlands.  History flatly contradicts Lyman's claim.  And as to
Lyman's surmise about the "objectives" of the Khartoum regime, this
seems absurdly complacent, given the history of this regime.  The
evidence of ethnic targeting of Nuba civilians for execution and
aerial attack is overwhelming.



Lyman would do well to read an account by Alex de Waal of the ghastly
history of genocide in the Nuba Mountains in the 1990s ("Averting
Genocide in the Nuba Mountains," 2006)



"The counterinsurgency fought by the Government of Sudan against the
rebels of the Sudan People's Liberation Army (SPLA) in the Nuba
Mountains of central Sudan during the early 1990s was not only
exceptionally violent, but also aimed at depopulating the area of
civilians. Not only did the government aim to defeat the SPLA forces
but they also intended a wholesale transformation of Nuba society in
such a way that its prior identity was destroyed. The campaign was
genocidal in intent and at one point, appeared to be on the brink of
success...."



"The war was notable for attacks on civilian targets with forced
displacement, rape and killing. The principal instruments of
counterinsurgency included locally-recruited militia, the regular army
and the air force, under the overall coordination of Military
Intelligence...."



"The early period of the war was marked by militia massacres and
extra-judicial executions by military intelligence. In a mixture of
reprisals and counter-insurgency, some of it pre-emptive, a coalition
of military officers and local militia commanders escalated violence
against the Nuba. The first step was the arming of local Arab tribes
by the government, initially as a panicked response to an SPLA attack
in the region in 1985, and in 1989 they were formalized into the
'Popular Defence Forces.' The militias committed the worst massacres
of the war, driven not only by orders from their paramilitary command,
but also by their own search for cattle, loot and cheap labor...."



"Death squads targeted community leaders in rural areas, while
intellectuals in the towns were rounded up by Military Intelligence
and 'disappeared.' The rationale was explained by Khalid Abdel Karim
al Husseini, formerly head of the security in the Office of the
Governor of Kordofan (and younger brother of the governor), until he
left Sudan and sought asylum in Europe in 1993.  He said that the
government was 'taking the intellectuals, taking the professionals, to
ensure that the Nuba were so primitive that they couldn't speak for
themselves.'"



All of this---all of it---is again evident in the conduct of
counter-insurgency war: the extra-judicial executions; the targeting
of intellectuals and indeed all Nuba; the arming of Arab militias and
the Popular Defense Forces (PDF), the latter now entirely Arab; the
depopulating of the Nuba Mountains; the campaign to deny food and
humanitarian assistance.  And as the Small Arms Survey makes clear in
its report on arms in South Kordofan ("Armed Entities in South
Kordofan," June 2011), the Khartoum-allied militia groups are
extremely heavily armed and supplied---this in addition to the growing
SAF military presence from Dilling to Kadugli.



Military developments could not be more ominous.



*****************



Below are two collections: one of my own recent writings on the grim
military logic that is now playing out; a second that gathers
especially important and very recent news reports on the situation in
South Kordofan:



Recent analyses and publications (Reeves, May/June 2011):



•"In Sudan, Genocide Anew?"  (We are, once again, on the verge of
genocidal counterinsurgency in Sudan. History must not be allowed to
repeat itself.)
from The Washington Post, June 18, 2011
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/in-sudan-genocide-anew/2011/06/17/AGVhCVZH_story.html



•"Genocide in the Nuba Mountains of Sudan," from Dissent Magazine
(on-line), June 22, 2011, http://dissentmagazine.org/atw.php?id=479



•"Abyei and South Kordofan: Why Our Diplomatic 'Successes' in Sudan
Aren't," from The New Republic, June 30, 2011
http://www.tnr.com/article/world/91086/abyei-sudan-kordofan



•"International Crimes and Threats to Peace in Sudan are mounting
rapidly," June 28, 2011, http://www.sudanreeves.org/Article341.html



•"Sudan: The Horror Continues---And the World Sits By," from The New
Republic, June 24, 2011
http://www.tnr.com/article/world/90653/sudan-darfur-kordofan-genocide



•"Genocide in Sudan: Is it Happening Again?" from The New Republic,
June 20, 2011
http://www.tnr.com/article/world/90243/kordofan-sudan-refugees-united-nations-obama



•"Obama's Second 'Rwanda Moment,'" The Sudan Tribune, June 14, 2011

http://www.sudantribune.com/Obama-s-Second-Rwanda-Moment,39204



•"An Abyei Timeline: The Long Road to Khartoum's Military Invasion,"
May 27, 2011, http://www.sudanreeves.org/Article328.html



•"Khartoum Dramatically Escalates War in Sudan," June 9, 2011

http://www.sudanreeves.org/Article332.html



•"Carter Center Fails to Consider Key Issues in the South Kordofan
Gubernatorial Election," (political incompetence and misprision—and a
failure to ask key questions—produce unwarranted ratification of
NIF/NCP victory by indicted war criminal Ahmed Haroun), May 20, 2011,
http://www.sudanreeves.org/Article325.html



[It is difficult to overstate the significance of this botched
monitoring job by the Carter Center; we will never know how events
would have preceded without this perversely encouraging "green light"
to Khartoum.]



•"'They Bombed Everything that Moved': Aerial military attacks on
civilians and humanitarians in Sudan, 1999 - 2011," (release of a
comprehensive report and database, http://www.sudanbombing.org )



[With the relentless bombing of the Nuba Mountains, as well as other
areas in South Kordofan, and Unity State in South Sudan, this
twelve-year record of Khartoum's barbarism has considerable current
relevance.]



Some very recent and revealing news stories from the region:



Jeffrey Gettleman, from the New York Times (dateline: Nuba Mountains):

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/01/world/africa/01sudan.html

Some truly extraordinary reporting.



Agence France-Presse, July 1, 2011 (dateline: Washington, DC) quotes
Princeton Lyman as saying, "We have every indication that [Beijing’s]
message to President Bashir has been, 'Look, you've got to resolve the
issues of the CPA,' Lyman said, referring to the 2005 Comprehensive
Peace Agreement which set the stage for southern independence." "Every
indication"?  And al-Bashir's vow today to finishing "cleansing the
Nuba Mountains" is an "indication" of what?



In the Wall Street Journal (June 22), Julie Flint, a highly seasoned
observer of the Nuba, notes with Mia Farrow: "The US special envoy to
Sudan, Princeton Lyman, has said there is not yet evidence that the
new Nuba war amounts to 'ethnic cleansing.' But confidential UN
reports that we've seen speak of 'wide-scale exactions against unarmed
civilians with specific targeting of African tribes,' and of people
targeted 'along racial/ethnic lines.'"



Associated Press reports that the "UN says Sudan's army continues
attacking civilians" (July 1, 2011).  In addition to the attacks on
civilians, this story (dateline: Juba) reports that: "The UN says
Sudan is denying it full access to tens of thousands of civilians near
an area between north and south Sudan where violence continues less
than 10 days before Southern Sudan becomes the world's newest nation."
(http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2011/06/30/ap/africa/main20075975.shtml)



Reuters reports (June 30, 2011; dateline: UN/New York)

"All UN agency offices were looted of their stocks and office
equipment in Kadugli, with the exception of the UNICEF children's
foundation and another agency, Haq said, citing information from the
UN's Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA)."
(http://af.reuters.com/article/sudanNews/idAFN1E75T20P20110630 )



BBC News Africa reports (June 23): "We are getting very strong reports
that house-to-house executions are going on by internal security
forces where summary executions are taking place based on ethnicity,
political affiliation and even how black you are. These are civilians,
intellectuals, teachers, community leaders, Muslims and Christians,
and often they are killed by their throats being slit. This may be
only the beginning and it could well continue for many months and
intensify. There is a complete lack of access---we learnt that the
only airstrip that was left had been bombed and we have heard the
government of Sudan will shoot down UN flights operating in South
Kordofan so humanitarian flights are no longer an option."
(http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-13882924 )



Agence France Presse reports (June 20; dateline: UN/New York):
"Sudanese forces have threatened to shoot down UN flights over South
Kordofan state where its troops are hunting and killing southern Sudan
followers, the US ambassador to the United Nations said Monday."



Amnesty International reports (June 24, London): Amnesty International
speaks out about "indiscriminate attacks, bombing from high altitudes
with imprecise bombs in areas which include civilians."



Associated Press reports (June 23) on actions taken by Khartoum on June 20:
"Sudanese intelligence agents posed as Red Crescent workers and
ordered refugees to leave a UN-protected camp in a region where
Sudan's Arab military has been targeting a black ethnic minority,
according to an internal UN report obtained Thursday [June 23]. The
report said agents from the National Security Service donned Red
Crescent aprons at a camp in Kadugli, South Kordofan and told the
refugees to go to a stadium for an address by the governor and for
humanitarian aid. The refugees were threatened with forced removal
from the camp if they did not comply.... The report...does not say
what happened to the camp residents after their forced removal on
Monday. The report did not say how many refugees were forced to leave
the camp."



And most ominously, Associated Press reports (June 29; dateline:
Geneva) on the view of the UN Deputy High Commissioner for Human
Rights, just back from Sudan: "'If this renewed fighting in border
areas doesn't stop and it further spreads to other areas of South
Kordofan and Blue Nile, then obviously it's war again,' said Kyung-wha
Kang, the UN Deputy High Commissioner for Human Rights."



And this is the great danger: that Khartoum will see the July 9 date
for Southern independence as the moment to use military force to
extract through negotiations or simply to seize by force disputed
border lands, risking all-out war. (In addition to Abyei, 20 percent
of the 2,100-kilometer North/South border is still neither delineated
nor demarcated).  The UN has reported on large troop build-ups by
Khartoum's regular Sudan Armed Forces (SAF) and the Sudan People's
Liberation Army (SPLA) in the region where northern South Kordofan and
Blue Nile states converge with southern (and oil-rich) Upper Nile
State.  Khartoum has exhibited extremely provocative military actions
along the border further west, including repeated bombings in Southern
territory near Jau.  Agok, where so many Ngok Dinka fled from Abyei,
has been subject to artillery shelling, and the critical Banton Bridge
(across the River Kiir) has been destroyed.



Renewed war now seems more likely than not.



July 1, 2011

_____________________________
Eric Reeves
Smith College
Northampton, MA 01063

[email protected]
413-585-3326
www.sudanreeves.org

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JFD 
info" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/jfdinfo?hl=en.

Reply via email to