On the sales of South Sudan Crude Oil for the month of July 2011

A Press Release by Dr. Lual Achuek Deng

The people of South Sudan were expecting the good news that their
government – the Government of Southern Sudan (GOSS) – has marketed
successfully its first entitlement (i.e. 100%) of crude oil produced
in the Republic of South Sudan during the period 9 – 31 July 2011.
However, such expectations were temporally dampen just 8 days away
from the historic date of celebrating the long awaited independence on
July 9, 2011, when one of our leaders initiated a fight over the media
against one of his comrade in the liberation struggle.  The recent
statement by the SPLM Secretary General Mr. Pagan Amum, alleging that
48% of revenues accrued from the sales of South Sudan crude oil for
the month of July has been given to the National Congress Party (NCP)
has created unnecessary confusion among the South Sudanese public.

This gratuitous confusion has made it necessary for me to protect my
dignity and image and to come clean in a true spirit of transparency,
accountability and responsibility, to which I expect comrade Pagan to
reciprocate. I wish my younger brother Pagan had chosen a different
vehicle to deliberate with civility this critical issue and away from
the media. But, I have no choice other than follow the same
methodology in explaining myself before God and the people of South
Sudan.

To begin with, I would like to assure the people of South Sudan that
their oil is in safe hands. I have not given a cent to the NCP and its
government, let alone a bigger amount of 48% as alleged by Pagan.
Moreover, I have neither the mandate to do so nor a family history of
treachery and betrayal of South Sudan; unlike many of our today’s
neo-nationalists whose brand of nationalism is nothing but tongue in
cheek.  A backward journey through the history of the liberation
struggle would demonstrate beyond doubt the heroic role played by the
community that I belong to. It is a community well known for
integrity, honesty and courage, so I cannot betray them under any
circumstances whatsoever!

 I would therefore like to present the following facts for the record
as well as to the people of South Sudan so that they make an informed
judgment as to who is telling them the truth and who is not:

1.     This whole saga of South Sudan’s oil sales was set in motion by
none other than Pagan when he wrote a letter dated 20 May 2011 (see
attachment I) to the NCP, asking them to take off their hands from our
oil with effect from July 9th. That move was a nationalistic one,
which was well within his right as Secretary General of the SPLM and
head of its negotiating team to the talks with the NCP. The letter was
further reinforced by Dr. Riek Machar Teny, Vice President of the
Government of Southern Sudan (GOSS) through his instruction to me to
operationalize it as a decision of GOSS.  Accordingly, I instructed
oil operating companies to comply and provide us with schedules (see
attachment II) for lifting, separating the ‘government’ entitlements
for July as follows:

a)     1 – 8 July 2011 entitlements: to be sold by the Ministry of
Petroleum (i.e. Sudanese Petroleum Corporation) but to be shared in
accordance with the Wealth Sharing Protocol of the CPA.  The lifting
program of the Dar Blend shows the government (i.e. GONU) entitlement
(2.34 million barrels) to be unusually larger for 8 days in comparison
to that of GOSS entitlement (2.6 million barrels) of 23 days. I called
on the Petrodar Operating Company (PDOC) Management when I noticed (12
June 2011) this seeming discrepancy to explain the underlying facts. I
was informed that the government entitlement for 8 days was 1,396,759
barrels. Add to this figure government stock at Field Processing
Facility (FPF) of 397,177 barrels; stock at Central Processing
Facility (CPF) of 355,251 barrels; and stock at Marine Terminal (MT)
of 256,683 barrels.  This makes the total government entitlement to be
2,405,870 barrels, which is to be divided according to the wealth
sharing formula stipulated in the CPA: 2% for Upper Nile State and
remaining 98% divided equally between GONU and GOSS. The technical
team assisting comrade Pagan at the negotiations in Addis Ababa could
not comprehend this point and instead they went for a simple
calculation of dividing 2,340,000 bbl by 4,940,000 (i.e. 2,340,000
plus 2,600,000) bbl, which resulted in their magical 48% (in fact
47.37% to be exact). However, a good manager/leader of any team should
have scrutinized the information deeper before hurriedly accusing a
seasoned student of data of betraying his people at the eve of their
long awaited independence! In fact, it was through our scrutiny of the
lifting program dated June 2, 2011 that my team was able to revise
upward from 2.34 million to 2.4 million barrels of government
entitlement for1 – 8 July and from 2.6 to 3.2 million barrels for GOSS
entitlement during the period 9 – 31 July 2011.

b)    9 – 31 July 2011entitlements: to be sold by GOSS in compliance
to comrade Pagan’s letter of 20 May 2011 (see attachment I).  This is
what the GOSS sold through the Marketing Team that was established by
Presidential Order number 33 of June 5, 2011 (see attachment III).

2.      Those familiar with the international oil industry know how
volatile a market it is. Thus, oil is sold at least 45 days ahead of
time to enable the buyers mobilize tankers and ensure that oil is
lifted at the appointed hour and day. As the SPLM decision did not
state how the South Sudan’s crude was to be sold, production companies
and clients alike went jittery. As a result, I flew to Juba on June 2,
2011 to be debriefed by President Salva Kiir Mayardit on the impending
dangers of not selling and lifting oil at the terminal on time. In
appreciation of those facts, the President issued the above mentioned
Presidential Decree No 33 on June 5th, 2011 establishing a temporary
marketing team to oversee the sales.

3.     Assisted by a USAID funded-consultant, the Marketing Team held
its first meeting (12 June 2011) in Khartoum in which prospective
buyers were identified. Four companies were picked on the basis of
their track records in paying and lifting the crude on time. The
contracts were just awarded ( see attachments IV and V) but not
signed. In fact, they are now being renegotiated in Addis Ababa by
Pagan and his team. As mentioned earlier, the Government of South
Sudan was to get 100% shares of its oil revenue with effect from July
9th. Thus, it was agreed at the Marketing Team meeting that oil
proceeds for the period 9 - 31 July 2011be deposited into the account
of the GOSS Ministry of Finance and Economic Planning, preferably with
a US-based bank, such as Citibank in New York instead of Bank of South
Sudan (BoSS). This is because BoSS is still part of the Central Bank
of Sudan (CBOS) at the time of sales of the July cargoes. It was also
another way of ensuring transparency in the management of our oil
revenues as stipulated in the Presidential Order No. 33 of June 5,
2011. With that marketing mechanism, none of the members of the
Marketing Team will ever touch or see a cent from the GoSS money in
the Citibank in New York. Now, where did I get 48% to give to the NCP?

4.     The allegation that the NCP was selling Southern oil was first
concocted by brother Garang Diing Akuong, Minister of Energy and
Mining (MEM) in the Government of South Sudan. Garang, who was a
member of the team, insisted that he attends the meeting with a
non-member of the team. When his request was rejected, he walked out
of the meeting, flew to Juba and held a press conference the next day,
claiming that the NCP was selling oil of the South.  In an utterly
loathsome mendacity, he presented himself to the Southern public
opinion as a hero and defender of their rights!  That an elected MP
and Minister went around lying about the nature and mandate of a panel
appointed by his President is unbelievably beyond any code of decency
and decorum.  Nevertheless, he succeeded to create enough confusion,
leading to the dissolution of the committee on June 15h.

In conclusion, I am glad that comrade Pagan’s accusation against me is
a blessing in disguise –it has set a sustained discourse for
transparency and accountability in our new Republic of South Sudan.
Let transparency and accountability therefore be the hallmarks of our
first Republic. In line with this new approach of open discourse of
public policy, I am ready to be questioned on this matter not only by
the Parliament but also by the media or indeed any audit or party
panels. In the same spirit, I expect the Secretary General to come
clean on the following issues:

a)      $30 million of the SPLM entitlement during the pre-Interim
Period, which was transferred to a US-based corporation in 2008 or
there about by the GOSS Ministry Finance and Economic Planning under
the instruction of the SPLM Secretariat. Where is that money and in
whose name has it been deposited?

b)    How much has been paid to the contractor that started in 2006
building the SPLM Headquarters in Juba. That building has remained to
this day a skeleton. Who is accountable within the Secretariat to the
delay in the completion of the building?

c)     I am interested to know how the Network of the World (NOW) was
sold to Vivacell Telecom Company. This is because NOW was acquired
through resources that were meant for the technical team, which
prepared the SPLM Strategic Framework for War-to-Peace Transition. The
team gave up these resources to enable the SPLM to embark on
investment programs.

Long live the people of South Sudan under the able leadership of
President Salva Kiir Mayardit whose leadership is guided by the spirit
of our fallen hero and leader the late Dr. John Garang de Mabior.

Released by Lual Acuek Lual Deng, PhD

2nd July 2011, Juba, South Sudan

COMMENTS, PLEASE CLICK HERE

Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the
author(s) and do not represent those of the website.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JFD 
info" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/jfdinfo?hl=en.

Reply via email to