On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 11:20:21AM +0100, Thomas Mangin wrote: > Could you please add somewher in your TODO/wishlist that JFF should not > report any BGP peer down (or at least not mark it as an error) if the IP > with BGP session is monitored and already marked as down. Most of the > time the IBGP/EBGP are done to loopback IP and this IP will already have > been monitored and marked as down.
Something on my long-range TODO is to re-write and expand the correlation part of JFFNMS. It would be able to do things like this and possibly stuff like what Nagios does with the paths to the NMS (eg the NMS uses router1 to get to router2, dont alarm router2 if router1 is down) It will be a while though. Anyone else is welcome to write it :) - Craig -- Craig Small GnuPG:1C1B D893 1418 2AF4 45EE 95CB C76C E5AC 12CA DFA5 Eye-Net Consulting http://www.enc.com.au/ MIEE Debian developer csmall at : enc.com.au ieee.org debian.org ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the 'Do More With Dual!' webinar happening July 14 at 8am PDT/11am EDT. We invite you to explore the latest in dual core and dual graphics technology at this free one hour event hosted by HP, AMD, and NVIDIA. To register visit http://www.hp.com/go/dualwebinar _______________________________________________ jffnms-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jffnms-users
