Yes, this was one of my main concerns while running this on Xbox-linux (Xebian). While it worked very well, I could only monitor about 40 routers with a 10 min polling interval before it started to get maxed out. This is also due to the 64MB of RAM it had.
If this isn't a production application that many users depend on, don't be afraid to adjust the polling interval. Also, adjust the Cisco devices to send traps (or syslog) for something like "errors" on up. Setting "debug" or "informational" will quickly overwhelm your JFFNMS box. -robin. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Richard Klingler Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 12:08 PM To: jffnms-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [jffnms-users] CPU usage Evening (o; Does anybody also experience high CPU load when using jffnms for few Cisco routers and UNIX servers? Doesn't seem to be fit enough for a small ISP...unless you spend big bucks on sevserl P4 3GHz machines for jffnms... rick ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today * Register for a JBoss Training Course Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005 Visit http://www.jboss.com/services/certification for more information _______________________________________________ jffnms-users mailing list jffnms-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jffnms-users ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today * Register for a JBoss Training Course Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005 Visit http://www.jboss.com/services/certification for more information _______________________________________________ jffnms-users mailing list jffnms-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jffnms-users
