I ran into a similar problem but found that (in my situation) that the
SNMP_PING function was the problem.  I removed that poller from the poller
group and one of my hosts went from a 45 sec poll time to 9.  From what I
can gather all this does is ping another host from a host via snmp.  I
didn't need this to happen so I just disabled it.  Javier or Craig may be
able to shine some more light on that.  

But I do also agree that the whole process could stand to be a bit more
efficient.  I have a machine running right now that monitors SNR, RX and TX
signal levels and traffic (~5 snmp values) on about 18,000 cable modems
every 5 minutes using a program called Braa.  We had issues with it actually
sending too many packets over our older linux gateways and using up too many
IRQ's and we would see packets drop when the poller when around to the
modems off that gateway.  Once we got it slowed down we haven't had any
issues with it.  It would be awesome if JFFNMS could do the same thing.
Just a suggestion to better this already awesome software. Keep up the good
work!

Thanks,
Kory

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jffnms-users-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Jackson
> Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 10:32 AM
> To: Leigh Porter
> Cc: jffnms-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [jffnms-users] poller speed
> 
> We used to run into similar issues. We've actually moved away from
> JFFNMS because of performance issues. Our server monitoring 1800
> interfaces was running at > 1.0 load averages 24/7. We ended up going
> another route for NMS. JFFNMS is still the only thing out there with it
> all built in one solution, however.
> 
> Ours was stuck in a loop where it would start the polling again before
> the first poller finished, which really wasn't that good.
> 
> I'd love to see JFFNMS with some faster pollers, perhaps something not
> written in PHP? I know the Cacti guys moved away from PHP pollers
> because of this.
> 
> --
> Tim Jackson
> Sr. Network Engineer
> STS Telecom
> (786)363-0361
> 
> Leigh Porter wrote:
> >
> > Hiya,
> >
> > I have hosts that have about 300 interfaces and yeah, it takes a while
> > to poll them :)
> > There is a threaded poller but I have not been able to make this work
> yet.
> >
> > Saying that, I have about 2200 interfaces and my CPU load is at 45 on a
> > duel cpu XEON :(
> >
> > --
> > Leigh
> >
> > Jason Lavoie wrote:
> >> I'm looking at using jffnms in our network.  The interface is great,
> and
> >> it looks very promising.  What I'm stumped on is the performance of the
> >> poller.
> >>
> >> To start, I've run autodiscovery against one of our routers, a cisco
> >> 6500, and it produces 599 interfaces. poller2.php never completes (it
> >> just times out), and poller.php takes > 5 minutes to poll just that one
> >> host:
> >>
> >> 10:20:44  :  H   2 : Poller End, Total Time: 539131.16 msec.
> >>
> >> The machine and network are quite sufficient, I believe.  When I run
> >> poller.php manually, it looks to be spending most of its time doing the
> >> snmp queries.  A glance at the code looks like it is running snmpget
> >> repeatedly for each OID.  Have there been any efforts to rework the
> >> poller to not have this (process forking) overhead?
> >>
> >> Are there others running jffnms' poller with a similar number of
> >> interfaces on a single host?  If the poller should scale to this size,
> >> can anyone recommend where to look for my performance bottleneck?
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >>
> >> -j
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services,
> security?
> > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job
> > easier
> > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache
> Geronimo
> > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
> > _______________________________________________
> > jffnms-users mailing list
> > jffnms-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jffnms-users
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job
> easier
> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
> _______________________________________________
> jffnms-users mailing list
> jffnms-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jffnms-users
> 
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.4.4/320 - Release Date: 4/20/2006
> 

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.4.4/320 - Release Date: 4/20/2006
 



-------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
jffnms-users mailing list
jffnms-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jffnms-users

Reply via email to