You are right, we missed that in the poller, not in the discovery part.
Its just a one liner in engine/pollers/tcp_status.php
change the line that looks like this:
$host_ip = $options["host_ip"];
for:
list($host_ip) = explode(":", $options["host_ip"]); //remove :port from host ip
I've added that change to 0.8.3-pre3 (which needs a lot of testing) :)
Javier
Tim Nelson wrote:
> I've read quite a few of the "Non standard SNMP port number" posts which
> have come across this list. However, I have been unable to find which
> correlates to my current problem. I've specified the ip address for a
> host with a port number as X.X.X.X:nnnnn where 'X' is the IP address and
> 'n' is the port number. I am able to pull SNMP data just fine. However,
> JFF now thinks that all of my previously open ports are closed. I can
> only assume it occurs because nmap is unable to scan X.X.X.X:nnnnn . It
> simply isn't expecting a port number to be present in the address. Is
> there a workaround for this? My only thought is to simply have to
> logical hosts in JFFNMS: one for simply scanning the ports, the other
> for pulling SNMP data. However, I would ideally like to have a single
> host for the whole server. Thank you!
>
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Javier Szyszlican, Project Leader, JFFNMS
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I hope JFFNMS or I were helpful to you, if you
can, please donate at http://jffnms.org/donate
_______________________________________________
jffnms-users mailing list
jffnms-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jffnms-users
