On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 04:20:18PM +1000, Darren Gibbs wrote:
> JFFNMS is not graphint he "traffic" for this interface - it graphs
> utilisation, RTT & Packet loss, packets, all of the others for the
> interface type - but not traffic. I should mention that a Cacti
> installation on the same server does graph traffic on these interfaces.
Is it all traffic interfaces or just traffic interfaces for a specific
type of interface?  Some older versions of JFFNMS had a problem with the
traffic graph which was an unescaped colon.

Also, what is "not graphed"?  You get no graph? An error? or a graph
with 0 or NaNs?

> My question is - is this likely to be related to the switch type
As it's the standard ifTable polling this is unlikely.  There are flaky
SNMP agent implementations and perhaps this switch is one of them, but
its not where I'd be looking first.

> Any suggestions?
Run the poller on the command line, check that the rrd file does exist
for that interface, then see what the graph is doing.

 - Craig
-- 
Craig Small      GnuPG:1C1B D893 1418 2AF4 45EE  95CB C76C E5AC 12CA DFA5
http://www.enc.com.au/                             csmall at : enc.com.au
http://www.debian.org/          Debian GNU/Linux, software should be Free 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate 
GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the 
lucky parental unit.  See the prize list and enter to win: 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
_______________________________________________
jffnms-users mailing list
jffnms-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jffnms-users

Reply via email to