On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 04:20:18PM +1000, Darren Gibbs wrote: > JFFNMS is not graphint he "traffic" for this interface - it graphs > utilisation, RTT & Packet loss, packets, all of the others for the > interface type - but not traffic. I should mention that a Cacti > installation on the same server does graph traffic on these interfaces. Is it all traffic interfaces or just traffic interfaces for a specific type of interface? Some older versions of JFFNMS had a problem with the traffic graph which was an unescaped colon.
Also, what is "not graphed"? You get no graph? An error? or a graph with 0 or NaNs? > My question is - is this likely to be related to the switch type As it's the standard ifTable polling this is unlikely. There are flaky SNMP agent implementations and perhaps this switch is one of them, but its not where I'd be looking first. > Any suggestions? Run the poller on the command line, check that the rrd file does exist for that interface, then see what the graph is doing. - Craig -- Craig Small GnuPG:1C1B D893 1418 2AF4 45EE 95CB C76C E5AC 12CA DFA5 http://www.enc.com.au/ csmall at : enc.com.au http://www.debian.org/ Debian GNU/Linux, software should be Free ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo _______________________________________________ jffnms-users mailing list jffnms-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jffnms-users