Hi JP, The memory issue (4) may be caused because of the units, in the rrd graphs jffnms uses the %s prefix to convert the units but this way it divides by 1000 instead of 1024.
"GPRINT:storage_total:MAX:'%6.0lf %sB\\n'", (portion of storage.inc.php) Best Regards, Felipe -----Mensaje original----- De: jpow...@tuffmail.com [mailto:jpow...@tuffmail.com] Enviado el: viernes, 21 de enero de 2011 17:04 Para: jffnms-users@lists.sourceforge.net Asunto: Re: [jffnms-users] jffnms-users Digest, Vol 52, Issue 1 Greetings to all. First, a hearty thank-you to Javier and all of the other developers/contributors that have made JFFNMS such a useful and robust tool. Each of my previous three employers has been highly impressed with the capability and utility of JFFNMS. JFFNMS and Cacti have become my go-to tools for managing availability and performance of all hosts that I am responsible for (even when more expensive commercial tools are readily available). On to my woes: I am using 0.8.5 (with rrdtool v1.4.3-1) on Ubuntu Server 10.10 to monitor a mixed bag of physical servers and VMware (guest) hosts, and I am having some interesting issues. I've checked the archives carefully, but have been unable to resolve these issues on my own. 1.) I have no Traffic graphs on any host (The RRDTool files for Interface ID 72 (from Host ID 4), has not been created by the Poller Process yet). I'm running 0.8.5, so the backslash\colon bug is not in play here. 2.) Network interface utilization on all guests (all Server 2003 R2, some hardware, some VMs) shows '0%'. There is a blue line on the graph ('Output Utilization') at 0%. There are no error messages. 3.) RTT & Packet Loss on all guests shows '0%'. There is a graph, but it is bare (no lines). Strangely, there is a 'The RRDTool files for Interface ID 84 (from Host ID 5), has not been created by the Poller Process yet') message below the graph. 4.) Physical Memory 'total storage' value is detected incorrectly on every host with > 4GB RAM. The higher the installed physical RAM, the greater the error, it seems. See attached screen shots. Occasionally, the 'used storage max' value' exceeds the value of the physical RAM, as well. There is no 'total storage' line visible, except at the far end of the graph. I've used JFFNMS previously (0.8.4 or 0.8.3, I believe), and had no issues, but then, I was not monitoring VMs, nor hosts with much more that 2-4GB installed RAM. My current implementation is a proof-of-concept for the big shots, and I'd like to get these issues solved (or at least understand the current limitations) before I seek final approval to install in production. I'd be grateful for any assistance or further clues. JP ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Special Offer-- Download ArcSight Logger for FREE (a $49 USD value)! Finally, a world-class log management solution at an even better price-free! Download using promo code Free_Logger_4_Dev2Dev. Offer expires February 28th, so secure your free ArcSight Logger TODAY! http://p.sf.net/sfu/arcsight-sfd2d _______________________________________________ jffnms-users mailing list jffnms-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jffnms-users
