On 09/23/11 02:06, Craig Small wrote: > On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 02:12:50PM -0400, wireless wrote: >> Does jffnms comply with RFC-6374 >> i.e. does it provide for MIB information on MPLS-TP data? > The short answer is no. > > RFC 6374 is a way of measuing IP SLAs on MPLS networks. While the > server running JFFNMS could have some sort of program written to send > out the probe packets, it probably makes more sense for it to be done > within the routers. > >> Anyone using RFC 6374 based monitoring with JFFNMS ? > JFFNMS has the Cisco IPSLA support already in a limited fashion. > Assuming routers present the information from RFC 6374 in some sort of > SNMP readable place it shouldn't be that hard to copy and change that > set of pollers etc so it shows the information. > > I've not seen it, but it doesn't mean someone hasn't done it already. > > - Craig
This is good news. I have some time to prepare. Do send me any more related information you run across on any sort of MIB related to MPLS; even it's just a sketch of what code needs to be extended, or where to plug in some additional code,or something somebody else has done to track MPLS performance on cisco routers. On another note, Postgres1-9 (9.0.4-r2) is finally stable enough (on gentoo) to resume my efforts with the latest version of JFFnms....(toes and fingers crossed).... thx, James ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy2 _______________________________________________ jffnms-users mailing list jffnms-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jffnms-users
