Hi,
We have been using jffnms for some time (4 years?) and are still on 0.8.3.
I am evaluating the upgrade to 0.9.x. We have several thousand
interfaces and encounter false alerts on a fairly regular basis, from
what I believe is jff being overloaded.
I see a recent post from Craig regarding optimizations of rrd. That is
good news. I wanted to inquire also about whether the snmp poller has
been optimized?
We wrote a tool in perl that uses rrd and scans and automatically adds
interfaces. It is running on most all the same devices as jffnms and
seems to work great. One optimization I made to this is that it combines
many SNMP GET requests into the same SNMP packet - as many as 50. This
dramatically cuts down on the number of SNMP packets that are generated,
and also cuts down significantly on the time required to poll.
Regards,
Jawaid
--
Jawaid Bazyar
President
ph 303.815.1814
fax 303.815.1001
jawaid.baz...@forethought.net <email:jawaid.baz...@forethought.net>
<http://www.foreThought.net>
Note our new address: 2347 Curtis St, Denver CO 80205
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct
_______________________________________________
jffnms-users mailing list
jffnms-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jffnms-users
