...and for anyone not on 0.9.4, the snmp_counter.php from 0.8.4 doesn't match up well (there have been some changes to that file, so this current patch is ahead of its time).
I didn't think it was fair to ask Craig to patch something from ~5 years ago (is that even right?.. might be older). So I did something foolish and just took that file (now patched on my test system) and dropped it in.. bam! It worked on 0.8.4 as well. Thanks again Craig! On Wednesday, March 26, 2014 10:27 AM, nairb rotsak <ipgur...@yahoo.com> wrote: That did it!! You just made a bunch of sysadmins VERY happy. They have become addicted to JFF! Thanks Craig!! On Tuesday, March 25, 2014 9:47 PM, Craig Small <csm...@enc.com.au> wrote: On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 03:57:50PM -0700, nairb rotsak wrote: > I deleted the discovered 9TB drive from JFF. I added the patch, then > rediscovered the drive (it still came back as -7697523019776 bytes). > I waited about 15 minutes, but it won't graph the drive at all (this is > the same behavior as I saw before). Also the same behavior if I remove > that minus sign.. it will give me a drive size of something like 4.01TB.. > but all the data is "nan".. If you run the poller manually do you see correct sort of numbers? I forgot to fix the discovery plugin too! The fix is for the poller only. I'll fix that tonight. - Craig -- Craig Small (@smallsees) http://enc.com.au/ csmall at : enc.com.au Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org/ csmall at : debian.org GPG fingerprint: 5D2F B320 B825 D939 04D2 0519 3938 F96B DF50 FEA5 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ jffnms-users mailing list jffnms-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jffnms-users
