Hi, I have recently (six weeks ago) switched all the filesystems
on my PC from 'ext3' to JFS for various reasons, in part because
I like the JFS design, in part because I had discovered that
over the past several months my 'ext3' ''root'' filesystem
performance had degraded by 7 times over that of a freshly
loaded copy of itself.

So I have decided to compare the read speed of my ''root'' JFS
filesystem as it is now, after six weeks of in-place package
upgrades, and how it would be if I reloaded it.

I have an otherwise quiescent disc, and I copied my ''root''
filesystem to it first as a partition image, to preserve the
''used'' layout, and then by 'tar', so that it would be reloaded
in an optimal ''new'' layout. The filesystem contains around
7.5GiB of data in 360k files, and 2.3GiB are free.

The result is that a whole-filesystem 'tar c' on the ''new''
layout takes 10min., on the ''used'' layout takes 26min., which
is a factor of over 2.5 times longer. I have also done some spot
checks on some largish files that I know have been regularly
updated/rewritten, and there are similar slowdowns (no slowdown
on files that have not been updated in the past six weeks).

  Details here: http://WWW.sabi.co.UK/Notes/anno05-4th.html#051101

Now 2.5 times is a lot better than 7 times (but the latter was
over a rather longer period on a filesystem with less free space),
but it is still somewhat disappointing, as the average transfer
rate for reading the whole filesystem goes down (on a disc
capable of around 35MiB/s sustained in optimal single-large-file
conditions) from 12MiB/s, which is reasonable, to 5MiB/s, which
is not awesome.



-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
_______________________________________________
Jfs-discussion mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jfs-discussion

Reply via email to