On Fri, 13 Jan 2006, Sonny Rao wrote: > On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 09:50:31AM -0800, Randy.Dunlap wrote: > > On Thu, 5 Jan 2006, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 06:36:11PM +0100, Laurent Vivier wrote: > > > > Any comments ? > > > > > > Is it really worth all this suffering? Can't we keep ext3 small and > > > point people who need bigger filesystems at XFS or JFS? > > > > Has JFS improved any in the last year or so? > > For some functions (e.g., 'rm -rf dir/'), it is terribly slow. > > This may not be one of the areas where JFS tries to be fast, > > but waiting for minutes instead of seconds for something > > like that is enough to stop me from using it. > > Otherwise I would like to use it. > > When was the last time you tried it? > > Several improvements to the log manager have been made in the last > couple kernel releases which should make this perform better.
It's probably been one year, so I'm game to try it again. Thanks, -- ~Randy ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click _______________________________________________ Jfs-discussion mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jfs-discussion
