On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 01:41:57PM -0600, Dave Kleikamp wrote: > On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 20:27 +0100, Ingo wrote: > > Hello Dave, > > > > Good News - it works perfect now! > > Many, many THANKS! > > > > >Maybe putting the patch inline somehow corrupted the formatting of the > > >patch. I'm attaching it instead of inlining it. Let me know if it > > >applies. > > > > Sorry for my recent e-mails reporting problems - it was my fault, I am not > > yet > > so familiar with Linux and SUSE 10.0 (did not know that modules are > > compiled in two steps). > > No problem. I didn't see the first email until you had already sent the > second, so I didn't worry about it. > > Moreover I now found that in the sources /jfs directory there also is a > > MAKEFILE, so > > I could have called just 'make' also from that place to just compile jfs. > > (next time I'll not have to wait for over 1 hour for output;-)
> Actually, you can build jfs.o by doing make fs/jfs/ from the linux > directory, but I don't know a shortcut to build the .ko file without > altering makefiles or the .config file. cd'ing to fs/jfs/ and running > make does not work. make SUBDIRS=fs/jfs should build just the jfs.ko Sonny ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Jfs-discussion mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jfs-discussion
