В письме от Wed, 06 Sep 2006 17:59:21 +0400, Dave Kleikamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> сообщал:
> The only library in jfsutils is statically linked to the utilities. > There is no general-purpose library. But e.g. e2fsprogs and xfsprogs installs it's libraries and headers. And I don't think that libxfs.a and libext2fs.a maybe called general-purpose library :-) >> So I can copy the code of this to my package, but it is not good. > > The on-disk format is unlikely to change, so using a copy of the code is > probably okay (jfsutils and anyfs-tools are both GPL). It's not the > cleanest solution though. So, I here to be clean :-) > Is this just a packaging request? That is, are the library and header > files useful as-is, or are there any particular functions that you need? Any particular functions I will include in my anyfs-tools package. It is not need to include any functions to jfs-utils, if it's don't use the function self. Althogh I have dream to replace all mkfs utilities with it's build_fs analogs in all fsprogs packages. :-) > It would make sense for the library and headers to be a separate > package, probably jfsutils-devel. Yes, of course, any distribution package with library and headers will named jfsutils-devel. But `make` of jfsutils seems doesn't build any distribution package. > I accept patches. :-) Confused.. If you offer to write modification for jfstutils MakeFile.am's self? Thanks. Sorry for bad english. -- registered Linux user #360474 Don't worry, I can read OpenOffice.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Jfs-discussion mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jfs-discussion
